Re: what is the fundamental difference between OSPF and IS-IS?

Felix Lin <flin@FOUNDRYNET.COM> Fri, 23 August 2002 02:23 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA16391 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 22:23:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <11.006E6C11@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 22:24:58 -0400
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 90323 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 22:24:58 -0400
Received: from 63.251.100.14 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 22:14:57 -0400
Received: from mailhost.foundrynet.com (mailhost [63.251.100.20]) by smtp.foundrynet.com (8.11.6/FoundryNetworks) with ESMTP id g7N2EuM24146 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:14:56 -0700
Received: from mailhost.foundrynet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.foundrynet.com (8.11.6/FoundryNetworks) with ESMTP id g7N2EuF21934 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:14:56 -0700
Received: from flin (ns100corpdmz.foundrynet.com [63.251.100.1]) by mailhost.foundrynet.com (8.11.6/FoundryNetworks) with SMTP id g7N2Euh21928 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:14:56 -0700
References: <B036F14C7A7FD511827000805FFEA8AD0C9EA1@eee-fs7.bham.ac.uk> <3D657D4D.852EE417@arc.corp.mot.com> <3D65867E.F0B387F@arc.corp.mot.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Message-ID: <007601c24a4b$b1d62800$4002a8c0@foundrynet.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:20:48 -0700
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: Felix Lin <flin@FOUNDRYNET.COM>
Subject: Re: what is the fundamental difference between OSPF and IS-IS?
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Arthur,

I tried searching for this paper on Internet but was unsuccessful. Is it
available publicly? How do I find it?

Thx
Felix
----- Original Message -----
From: "Arthur Dimitrelis" <arthurd@ARC.CORP.MOT.COM>
To: <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 5:49 PM
Subject: Re: what is the fundamental difference between OSPF and IS-IS?


> Sorry, I take that last point back. The said paper is available in
electronic
> form, but I have no idea if it's free (in a monetary sense) or not.
>
> arthur
>
> Arthur Dimitrelis wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > there is a paper by Radia Perlman that answers your question, entitled
"A
> > Comparison Between Two Routing Protocols: OSPF and IS-IS". It appeared
in the
> > September 1991 issue of the IEEE Network Magazine. Contact me off list
if you
> > need help finding it (it's freely available in electronic form).
> >
> > cheers,
> > Arthur
> >
> > "Liu B." wrote:
> >
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > Thanks for answering my previous questions. I am reading RFC 1142 (OSI
IS-IS
> > > Intra-domain Routing Protocol), in order to compare OSPF with IS-IS.
There
> > > are so many common things between two of them, such as area routing,
virtual
> > > link, designated router ... what is the fundamental difference (or
> > > improvement?) between OSPF and IS-IS?
> > >
> > > Thanks again for all your helps.
> > >
> > > Bin Liu
>