Re: [OSPF] WG adoption---draft-chen-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3?

Support

It eases the transition to ipv6 and avoids running two protocols without 
yet enabled but planned IPv6.

Am 25.08.2014 23:57, schrieb Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang:
> I read the draft and support its adoption.
>
> Jeffrey
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:acee@cisco.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 4:39 PM
>> To: Ing-Wher Chen; ospf@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG adoption---draft-chen-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3?
>>
>> Hi Helen,
>> As an author, I would certainly support this work. I think it is clearly
>> in the OSPF WG¹s best interest to facilitate migration to a single
>> version. When that happens will be dependent on numerous factors
>> including
>> requirements, deployments, and how well we facilitate it.
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>>
>> On 7/22/14, 8:53 PM, "Ing-Wher Chen" <ing-wher.chen@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'd like to ask if the working group would adopt and help improve and
>>> refine
>>> the following draft:
>>>
>>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3/>
>>>
>>> This document describes a mechanism to transport OSPfv3 over IPv4.
>>> The mechanism allows devices to migrate to OSPFv3 first, which would
>> help
>>> with transition to IPv6 later.
>>>
>>> The latest -01 version addresses an earlier question by including
>>> an IPv4-only use case in which deployed devices cannot communicate
>>> in IPv6 but would benefit from using the mechanism proposed in this
>> draft
>>> to transition to OSPFv3 for now.  Until all devices can communicate
>> using
>>> IPv6,
>>> consolidating to OSPFv3 can still reduce operational complexity and
>> cost.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Helen
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OSPF mailing list
>>> OSPF@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf