Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3452)

[Acee Lindem <[e-mail]>]

All, 
Since section is 11 is describing the contents of a single routing table entry, there is only one destination and adding "same" would be redundant. Hence, I recommend that this errata be rejected. 
Thanks,
Acee 
On Jan 12, 2013, at 9:39 PM, RFC Errata System wrote:

> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2328,
> "OSPF Version 2".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2328&eid=3452
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: David Jet <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: 11
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> Multiple LSAs may reference the destination, however a tie-breaking scheme always reduces the choice to a single LSA. 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Multiple LSAs may reference the same destination, however a tie-breaking scheme always reduces the choice to a single LSA. 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> I think should add the "same" to describe it more clearly.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC2328 (no draft string recorded)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : OSPF Version 2
> Publication Date    : April 1998
> Author(s)           : J. Moy
> Category            : STANDARD
> Source              : Open Shortest Path First IGP
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG