IETF Logo Mail Archive

Database Overflow problem

Amit Srivastava <ospfisfun@YAHOO.COM> Tue, 13 August 2002 11:42 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA08280 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:42:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <21.006D12B8@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 7:43:21 -0400
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 101759 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:43:20 -0400
Received: from 66.218.78.81 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:43:19 -0400
Received: from [203.200.20.226] by web40302.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 04:43:19 PDT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-ID: <20020813114319.27157.qmail@web40302.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 04:43:19 -0700
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: Amit Srivastava <ospfisfun@YAHOO.COM>
Subject: Database Overflow problem
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <20020812041146.57827.qmail@web40304.mail.yahoo.com>
Precedence: list

Hi All,
   I have a major doubt regarding the database
overflow.
If i follow the same approach as mentioned by the RFC
1765 is it becomes necessary that my database will be
identical in all the routers(i.e same LSAs in all the
router within the AS).
Actually i came across a scenario where your database
may not be identical even if you have the same
ospfExtLsdbLimit variable in all your router.
I don't know if it is a bug or is it a normal working
condition.
If any one know about it plz help
Regards
Amit


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status