Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement"

"Russ White" <7riw77@gmail.com> Sat, 06 May 2017 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <7riw77@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94861200C5 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 May 2017 06:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wML9fHiFlseI for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 May 2017 06:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x241.google.com (mail-qk0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF4CD1286B1 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 May 2017 06:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x241.google.com with SMTP id o85so4408792qkh.0 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sat, 06 May 2017 06:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=ropumT97IOqnWq7EOfQv/geZzwWowLv9NFNGAuzLZmM=; b=O86SqVuZ9XcXuQ0/QqN9Z2Hs06NdYD9vzDHk4hu8mnvn1fhsUzm4m3RG6RIehvh8t7 wKDl6pSjgAmHCoZPuPj0K/FTJwouKl0LAWq1WYQHazABdALgl9+BSxWjrC32G7pfWd0H hJK8GLr40KlSPOA+Mz6CF4mHsp8//HaWd6qfzAzO00TKoKP9rjm1MlrPx5Z9d3tSrUOk KlWJui0aTcu3+Z30JiebSO043yhs4IADQVgzqlm7R2M1oM1BjxogDfS9PAoOoOPN2qUM hnBtUUycMjjP3j7h2bU8w2tGJvTY1EjUFP0rxtpETcTuCuW56txtg1zBazGa56xjheAa OygA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=ropumT97IOqnWq7EOfQv/geZzwWowLv9NFNGAuzLZmM=; b=tP3OgLPCzMwWla4pGrGiyPuI6HoDvaFx0nv8ph9iYAOprVPuMDje7Vd7RaiaWxMCKD dOOgqHro2Ye/SOKGuttoCIOVZw6owJkM4C2kp1dk6ArFWMrFxifsqA5oCoH1TVoNnskI h+FkrLKRBDBn3M+xXKsCsfacGOiiBOu+nGXcE5gSGjULoLJeybT7zFiYIfbz0yxGL+eN KQ9eg3vKXYjqZkW4n6vSlMhd8t1yXyI3i1KLeMmFqAVqXYQd9Oy7NG8Ytvm8msvB2Yre fl/uTeQViSk/Fe1sSHxQ0Jt+bVzJrwoi2jemDoudVtQwfrJovz3GAcC8Esi1LuQlbCgP /++w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcA9LY6Cb5votc1astAth846JH0uluBlbvZytqWAwvF9Up95HFQg +LtEEkPFrGvKRA==
X-Received: by 10.55.79.211 with SMTP id d202mr16301069qkb.298.1494076806983; Sat, 06 May 2017 06:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Russ (108-78-210-25.lightspeed.chrlnc.sbcglobal.net. [108.78.210.25]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q66sm6260765qkd.69.2017.05.06.06.20.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 06 May 2017 06:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Russ White" <7riw77@gmail.com>
To: "'Les Ginsberg \(ginsberg\)'" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, "'Acee Lindem \(acee\)'" <acee@cisco.com>, "'OSPF WG List'" <ospf@ietf.org>
References: <D530EF1D.ACB7C%acee@cisco.com> <D53106AD.ACBA9%acee@cisco.com> <3c98aeb64ea742eaa5038eee24445028@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <3c98aeb64ea742eaa5038eee24445028@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 09:20:03 -0400
Message-ID: <070901d2c66b$7989f3d0$6c9ddb70$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQJclWmElKz1cWERtjTyR9HGEMviSgGJYFeSAbg+NY2guZ8L4A==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/XlwSeEp08BNtGrVlxO-qY-oSP74>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement"
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 May 2017 13:20:10 -0000

> Acee has captured very well the compelling(sic) reasons for defining these
> extensions.

Agreed -- support the adoption of this draft as a WG doc.

😊 /r