Re: [OSPF] Routing for IPv4-embedded IPv6 Packets - draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-02.tst

Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com> Mon, 09 July 2012 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174FD11E80E1 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.541
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.541 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3JMlUYa06dq3 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD4411E80D2 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id q69Ff2R1009876; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:41:08 -0500
Received: from EUSAACMS0702.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.205]) by eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 11:41:07 -0400
From: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
To: Dean cheng <dean.cheng@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:41:04 -0400
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Routing for IPv4-embedded IPv6 Packets - draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-02.tst
Thread-Index: Ac1d6UGZ8N2VvsrdTtK8K/K7Qm3MFw==
Message-ID: <8C713700-DB78-442F-96C7-A07CEE385752@ericsson.com>
References: <DC7880973D477648AC15A3BA66253F6851A3E32D@szxeml523-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <DC7880973D477648AC15A3BA66253F6851A3E32D@szxeml523-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-105-616528491"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Routing for IPv4-embedded IPv6 Packets - draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-02.tst
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:40:47 -0000

I have reviewed the subject draft and would encourage others to review it as well. We want to WG last call the -04 version which will be posted prior to the deadline. 
Thanks,
Acee 
On Jul 9, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Dean cheng wrote:

> We’ve received some comments and plan to post a new revision
> before 7/16 (the deadline). Please take a look of this draft and
> send us comments much appreciated.
>  
> Cheers
> Dean
>  
> From: Dean cheng 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 2:16 PM
> To: 'Acee Lindem'; OSPF List
> Subject: RE: [OSPF] Routing for IPv4-embedded IPv6 Packets - draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-02.tst
>  
> We’ve made some editorial improvements and just posted
> as a -03 revision.
>  
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-03
>  
> Comments welcome.
>  
> Cheers
> Dean
>  
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ospf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> > Acee Lindem
> > Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 2:28 PM
> > To: OSPF List
> > Subject: [OSPF] Routing for IPv4-embedded IPv6 Packets - draft-ietf-ospf-
> > ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-02.tst
> >
> >
> > Speaking as WG Co-Chair,
> >
> > I'd like to WG last call this prior to Vancouver to volunteer to review
> > it? There hasn't been a lot of discussion after we concluded that the
> > translation was aligned with work in the BEHAVE WG.
> > Please take a look and post comments. It is not that long a draft by may
> > require you to at least scan RFC 6052.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Acee