Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag

Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@ericsson.com> Tue, 26 August 2014 07:08 UTC

Return-Path: <uma.chunduri@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D1051A093B for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U5eGqkX0VHY5 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg21.ericsson.net (usevmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B01FC1A0977 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c6180641-f79916d00000623a-7f-53fbdb5425d1
Received: from EUSAAHC005.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.87]) by usevmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 9B.F9.25146.45BDBF35; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 02:56:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB105.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.122]) by EUSAAHC005.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 03:08:34 -0400
From: Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@ericsson.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Poll for WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag
Thread-Index: AQHPwKoSGbQFoOONyUaUf4QhM2C3GJvidwXg
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 07:08:34 +0000
Message-ID: <1B502206DFA0C544B7A60469152008633F362465@eusaamb105.ericsson.se>
References: <D0212051.2116%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D0212051.2116%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.10]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1B502206DFA0C544B7A60469152008633F362465eusaamb105erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrDLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPuG7I7d/BBrOfGVlMfjuP2aLl3j12 ByaPKb83snosWfKTKYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugStje9sttoKL2hUL3mU2MM5R72Lk5JAQMJF4 0/6BHcIWk7hwbz1bFyMXh5DAUUaJf50z2SGc5YwSd+bsYQapYhPQk/g49SdYh4iAl8SNiU1g trCAi8Thr61MEHFXiTUX1jBC2EYSu7v/gtWwCKhKbPszkwXE5hXwlXhw4gtYjZCAlsSWV0vZ QGxOAW2JG5OPg9mMQBd9P7UGbCazgLjErSfzmSAuFZBYsuc8M4QtKvHy8T9WCFtJYtLSc6wQ 9fkSF198YoXYJShxcuYTlgmMIrOQjJqFpGwWkjKIuI7Egt2f2CBsbYllC18zw9hnDjxmQhZf wMi+ipGjtDi1LDfdyHATIzB6jkmwOe5gXPDJ8hCjAAejEg+vAufvYCHWxLLiytxDjNIcLEri vJrV84KFBNITS1KzU1MLUovii0pzUosPMTJxcEo1MM4N1OU9r//xaXOf5M5dFjGvJ/BuZpDY dGpFOEfK3X/R4hIPp/Kn8rNtOb6z/bLr/wdxonzB1zOlzkzWECn82PM08+FO2S2vWa48mr9D yyU60/hRpPOiOwIHY+d9vrpD0zq9bFaex5cl19lFzO+XRK36Y1ZY/Jl/R0u2iLXznbSrFtdK jj61vqnEUpyRaKjFXFScCABwJkrnfwIAAA==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/YbdP5aGrggO04M5qA2hV3N4gHqw
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 07:08:40 -0000

Support this.
..definitely useful beyond the RLFA eligibility use cases.

--
Uma C.

From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 2:18 PM
To: ospf@ietf.org
Subject: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag

There are situations where node level policy is required and an OSPF advertised admin tag simplifies this. For example, advertisement of remote-LFA eligibility.

Please indicate your support or objections to adopting this draft as an OSPF WG document.

Thanks,
Acee