Re: [OSPF] H-bit Support for OSPFv2 - draft-keyupate-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-01 WG Document Adoption Poll

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 09 October 2015 13:38 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C461B3E24 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 06:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0fAGdlt9WLX5 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 06:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1123A1B3E23 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 06:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=868; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1444397909; x=1445607509; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=+/VsyzP3ADPEGggOFHULaVn6LJNU0J18O4k8B484avU=; b=BBHszKfNcHEgU5K0k0ExH/6lJYWMgnEWYQMOf7FKp/2ZwClstag4Lj/M wRuxQ/+60OgPwsPjzrVvuIFPdR0HVmXN1+CTkwfK8iiaNioK+xONNYfmd eFSwxTUdY7B5fJgwnfRZHwkL8NvCjaInhvEXinMMJfCYt5eI+tk7rYKP8 Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AgAgAVwhdW/5NdJa1egyaBMw8GvV4BDYFagxOCCn8CHIEtOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEJwEBBCMRRRACAQgaAiYCAgIwFRACBAENBYgurzmUFwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReBIopPhQ0HgmmBRQEElhIBjRmBWIQ6kX6Dbx8BAUKCRIE+cYZkgQYBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,658,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="195750156"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Oct 2015 13:38:28 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (xch-aln-004.cisco.com [173.36.7.14]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t99DcSGr028673 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 13:38:28 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 08:38:25 -0500
Received: from xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com (173.37.183.75) by xch-aln-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 08:38:25 -0500
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.127]) by xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([173.37.183.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 08:38:27 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Keyur Patel (keyupate)" <keyupate@cisco.com>, "Padma Pillay-Esnault (ppe)" <ppe@cisco.com>, "Manish Bhardwaj (manbhard)" <manbhard@cisco.com>, "Serpil Bayraktar (serpil)" <serpil@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: H-bit Support for OSPFv2 - draft-keyupate-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-01 WG Document Adoption Poll
Thread-Index: AQHQ+I4sOqe7VD7MpUCLZtUUn93yZp5jTy4A
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 13:38:26 +0000
Message-ID: <D23D3ADE.34520%acee@cisco.com>
References: <D22C6483.32EB0%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D22C6483.32EB0%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.37.102.19]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <8F017D28475614419D7487966BA41745@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/ZBDwwkRSiGkYGgZue7_trkLpGtk>
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] H-bit Support for OSPFv2 - draft-keyupate-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-01 WG Document Adoption Poll
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 13:38:31 -0000

Authors, 
There is support for making this a WG document. Please resubmit this draft
as draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-00.txt.
Thanks,
Acee

On 9/26/15, 3:04 PM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> wrote:

>This draft was presented in Prague and there was consensus in the room
>that it was a valid use case. It provides protocol mechanisms to
>absolutely prevent transit traffic for OSPFv2 Routers (RFC 6987 only
>discourages transit traffic). The draft also includes assurance of
>backward compatibility.
>
>Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG
>Document.
>
>Thanks,
>Acee
>
>