IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator

Manav Bhatia <manavbhatia@gmail.com> Fri, 05 February 2016 02:53 UTC

Return-Path: <manavbhatia@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5601B2D94; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:53:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HPmVy9QAEbKw; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:53:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22f.google.com (mail-yk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84E961B2D92; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:53:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id z7so53960086yka.3; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 18:53:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3M0BftjIfJD0u3bv3vPuGE1ozM9ygTD89tndw7ihfYI=; b=TknE6P3QnRVOJ3w+xOKo7cmrihvT5vC4U3yw0jpyYd6n3X47eI/Bc2zNaiQLoWD7zZ 5dTaXRmH7F6tc2D4vNWDipFKr1iNXbTM3+bVCo/xEdPelGlGMvXW1pEHMDkgbSoRWIK5 e1ox7IJzqERyBwpYR1r+cbDjBTGIDkI7/bUp8PCRbS3JC2TwTQ98rCHPNLuAmTnwy3zl GbOsVU3d71XEJsJ8Uesjh/T7qdlYSyab+YHdtwI06VcaTgxmgP6Dr82CAfolESsk14cs wNlTj/REPTZZeNsv4+R1xqeYwRDmRHHQQCsC3KlYgxz2oK2e2z25PYVWmixreKfhrftO f2Qw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3M0BftjIfJD0u3bv3vPuGE1ozM9ygTD89tndw7ihfYI=; b=EKKkuOgq4o/0lobsS35dlOMn5lXLfiz7feRz5yh3TVq/Csw29siQ9y0BXuT0Q465JG UkLnlIV1ftjZBojYoKYvzBy2ZY1/zYGFonweEESdsyjgmEWamyUt7eMyGNI3iynhLxCz cLKhSEmTMpa/vpOXtjyHvrmSDL89IutlNAHLgfkz+H6Rub31TXVCkqxuq4nVPeIGfQQs 5x/IgOjSSERJAFnSGJVwzvVkuQGM+8hJjsauR6jk9SWiccN9cFSAW4cIz6M60nV/GOPO eRD5ezPaaFGzLJepPAX4pKgqsgO3mJU+VuhOrVtuq7GK6+H1OhWJLu6TpShfXZ2wbwzX g+Dg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQ6WS/5CRmebqce7OpVPtj7titXdRFQsWjJjAQ4GN3ZlTwJ/Oqowodvp6rd3QyZPrdZUoVqT00xyjYQYw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.37.93.214 with SMTP id r205mr5970814ybb.93.1454640824825; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 18:53:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.13.212.139 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:53:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D055B8DB-8D78-4CEC-8E7F-90E9BD6E0A47@cisco.com>
References: <D252E730.385E8%acee@cisco.com> <CAG1kdojiU6fzn7XYSSdpfabxMDUQYvbgNNRCjZbraJKq2+WwJQ@mail.gmail.com> <D2668656.3CED2%acee@cisco.com> <c3caff28c3d243b99e523be8bc64719f@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <D2669DC6.3CF08%acee@cisco.com> <8ef4f51407804a91950ab126277368a6@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <D2691731.3D460%acee@cisco.com> <DBFC89CC-221C-42C8-8A11-E0E5A49170EC@cisco.com> <D2D90F1A.4B992%acee@cisco.com> <D055B8DB-8D78-4CEC-8E7F-90E9BD6E0A47@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:23:44 +0530
Message-ID: <CAG1kdohexHAJBRas53K7YB+U3yE_Nhy5FGd-n4vmr47dNMbU6A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Manav Bhatia <manavbhatia@gmail.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11422c00a3c0a0052afcf5bf"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/ZhxAqnRfRyCnyWi1n4bNRBgzKVI>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 02:53:50 -0000

Hi Carlos,

I think we need to add the following in the current version:

“When multiple S-BFD discriminators are advertised how a given
discriminator is mapped to a specific use case is out of scope for this
document.”

I dont have the xml with me that i can update. Can you do it if you have
one with you?

Cheers, Manav

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <
cpignata@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi, Acee,
>
> On Feb 4, 2016, at 2:24 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Carlos,
>
> From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
> Date: Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 2:16 PM
> To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
> Cc: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, Manav Bhatia <
> manavbhatia@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org" <
> draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator
>
> Hi, Acee,
>
> Following up on your note below regarding
> draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator, could you request publication and send
> this document to the IESG?
>
>
> Has the document been updated with the proposed text? It hasn’t been
> modified since Sept 24, 2015.
>
>
> Yes. The only text modification proposed and to be implemented was done
> here:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator-02.txt
>
> I do not believe there was anything else pending. Do you mean something
> else?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Carlos.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
>
> [BTW, its sibling document on ISIS is already in IESG ballot.]
>
> Thanks!
>
> — Carlos.
>
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> I was more concerned about the consumer of the information than the IGPs.
> I did look at base S-BFD draft and I agree this unspecified. Let’s go
> forward than with the proposed text and I will request publication.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email