Re: [OSPF] Quagga OSPF

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 04 January 2017 11:58 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548F31293EC for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 03:58:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.622
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.622 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cpW5_Hb8AoXz for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 03:58:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFE34129482 for <OSPF@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 03:58:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1152; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1483531092; x=1484740692; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=9kaTSU8Pe0ZBMLbsIu39P+5QwsXLH52fi5F3Ba4MDgk=; b=IeLODFIFQqDKrpxTtqK9UUTRrdh5iq0RDH/t2WVUdEL5FZBHrm0Ir07v 9Bgen6j6ELYgfYUIUgXumorMyQDPuG/mTButz/eHJusQZ/fHkTdTe8nh3 AAlvXbvMnH53/r9EBgqKCNgsz1iysl0+/iAkngCl2n1VhWiF6uRkGhImQ M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AUAQDx4WxY/5BdJa1eGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBgzgBAQEBAR9fgQwHjVCURpUigggfC4V4AoFMPxQBAgEBAQEBAQF?= =?us-ascii?q?jKIRpAQEEAQE4NAsQAgEIGB4QJwslAgQBDQUbiFUOsTiKNAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAR2LJoopAQSbCQGGVYprgkeOEpI/AR84gSsuhWNyhyWBDQEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,459,1477958400"; d="scan'208";a="366554618"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Jan 2017 11:58:11 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (xch-rtp-015.cisco.com [64.101.220.155]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v04BwBtQ019646 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 4 Jan 2017 11:58:11 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 06:58:10 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 06:58:10 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Paul Jakma <paul@jakma.org>, sree ietf <sree.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Quagga OSPF
Thread-Index: AQHSZYxgSfrZv6G/ekmfktwRgo4Vt6EogssA//+1t4A=
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 11:58:10 +0000
Message-ID: <D4924CFE.90B4D%acee@cisco.com>
References: <CANguO-9D-H+EeH841rbA9x8iS-XZQ5RNdTKHC4FhQnc-zt3L2A@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.2.20.1701041121060.23648@stoner.jakma.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1701041121060.23648@stoner.jakma.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.199]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <9A8992F615FA6D47B741BC80C1BD4FF4@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/_IUn4jgsBLy7AVTpTcFcBpTJjrM>
Cc: "OSPF@ietf.org" <OSPF@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Quagga OSPF
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 11:58:14 -0000

Hi Paul, 

On 1/4/17, 6:23 AM, "OSPF on behalf of Paul Jakma" <ospf-bounces@ietf.org
on behalf of paul@jakma.org> wrote:

>On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, sree ietf wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Does OSPF QUAGGA supports Segment Routing?
>
>It doesn't, but it could be interesting.
>
>It's worth noting that you can already somewhat create arbitrary paths
>between different source/dests, or different paths from shortest for
>arbitrary dests, from a central controller, using just standard OSPF.
>See the SIGCOMM "Central Control Over Distributed Routing" paper and
>http://fibbing.net. Really interesting work.

Interesting but certainly not a generalized solution offering the breadth
of functionality and flexibility as OSPF Segment Routing.

Thanks, 
Acee 



>
>regards,
>-- 
>Paul Jakma | paul@jakma.org | @pjakma | Key ID: 0xD86BF79464A2FF6A
>Fortune:
>How long does it take a DEC field service engineer to change a lightbulb?
>
>It depends on how many bad ones he brought with him.
>
>_______________________________________________
>OSPF mailing list
>OSPF@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf