IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Sat, 10 January 2015 21:09 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA581A1A09 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:09:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FkNNwLmytY6m for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:09:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A80011A0137 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:09:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=689; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1420924159; x=1422133759; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=1Eh0X63urNgYxYymiiSGgB+pERAONzhhGXR9056x3Wo=; b=JvqqMunqulz/Qg9DQJkhhIGhO92KLRu1ZTyRDB71JcM1f1oXBizcdsVB o0au1//Qj5YjIh2Ia1Hxi0cvPv0Zm4UGNl89bk7gS0TXW24nREZQuESer yMvglF/l7YqD9DOLzkPjA/3cGggJlD6RUKPq1NSidtBp/I66z0G4AsaU1 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgkFAASUsVStJA2J/2dsb2JhbABbgwZSWATGBoZ8QwEBAQEBfYQTOlEBPkInBByIIw2mYqJOLJQpBY46iQ2BD4Jxij2DOiKDbm8BgUR+AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,737,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="386327551"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2015 21:09:19 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com [173.36.12.82]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0AL9J6X024049 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 21:09:19 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.144]) by xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com ([173.36.12.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 15:09:18 -0600
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental
Thread-Index: AQHQLRmyvootEbC0aUKyIBteteuJPw==
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 21:09:18 +0000
Message-ID: <D0D6FF2C.B5B6%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.197]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <5D63109FD0E2864882229E5ADB2675B8@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/_l3faVTeaAlWOPpJsFb5wVHA4Ug>
Subject: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 21:09:21 -0000

We have discussed OSPF TTZ at several IETFs and the authors and their
colleagues have even developed a working prototype. We believe there is
consensus that the protocol mechanisms are viable. However, there is
disagreement as to whether or not these mechanisms will provide
significant benefit. The answer is definitely topology and deployment
dependent. After some discussion, we have decided to poll for adoption as
an experimental draft. Please indicate your support or opposition WG
adoption as experimental prior to January 24th, 2015.

For your convenience, here is a URL for the draft:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-chen-ospf-ttz-09.txt

Thanks,
Acee and Abhay

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email