Re: [OSPF] AD review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-04

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Tue, 22 September 2015 19:02 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566061ACDB1; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PQKS6SJ3oO_g; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22b.google.com (mail-ob0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8381B1ACD8E; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbmp4 with SMTP id mp4so15627591obb.3; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Brt/XEewbueUoe8c3FPymdyi+OntKXYKkYuLoyEC4Rw=; b=nfk++ysjiIgno9fCCcuXd4RGSIIuY6/av0Rr3tnGfStqZRqDDDDJ4Qa2E/sSuJzUE9 DlWOp1l+oApugavtE/2+yd7tbmiMg/oKLjZgEz4ksPwO2ZBJttV4NX4Izo5K7IeoDbFq KAbrBN1uD/dnRoubk81c3EnhLefOA2BJ8o0EsX59Uzo+IiFKi0ra42j52Lu8EEgyGkWD m/f9nE/Uaj+C95JNgBL5v4W4UiGycnzKSfJISeQmgo8C6611y4ImuGmMvL///nhCJwnH yYBf8ZqkX5IAwoE/bgvJVatL5GYkb4vYWuWOoXYT5A6WtnnYmJRrqJHz+pm/04QhZt5H QA0A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.134.40 with SMTP id ph8mr6020455oeb.58.1442948530922; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.55.170 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rdCDNrk+Hn0SkSx1LeRfSUHr+LLSJ8LR-k5ui6WUm0h3A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAG4d1rdCDNrk+Hn0SkSx1LeRfSUHr+LLSJ8LR-k5ui6WUm0h3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:02:10 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rfOa9M8adSxocHka0wYL7wZbUP94ujGC9CW16QOiSBEfA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b47289a9d6adb05205aa2f5
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/_t5eSVisQJNffflx0-0-VSIKPtY>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] AD review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-04
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 19:02:13 -0000

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:

> As is customary, I have done my AD review of
> draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-04
> before requesting IETF Last Call.
>
> First, I'd like to thank the working group and Shraddha, Harish, Hannes,
> Rob,
> Anton, Zhenbin, and Bruno for their hard work on the draft.  However, this
> short
> draft has 7 authors, which is a couple over the author limit for RFCs.
> Experience
> has shown that it takes much longer to process a draft through AUTH48 and
> the
> other steps necessary (responsiveness to comments, agreement, etc) with a
> large
> number of authors.  While I am willing to be persuaded - on or off list -
> that all 7
> of the current authors are actively editing, I would prefer that a smaller
> number be
> selected as the active editors.
>
> While that discussion is ongoing, here are my technical comments.  In
> general,
> the draft is in good shape but could use some English grammar editing; I
> have not
> tried to indicate all the places where "the" is missing, for instance.
>
> 1) In the abstract: "This optional operational capability allows to
>    express and act upon locally-defined network policy which considers
>    node properties conveyed by tags."
>
>    What is the subject that "to express and act upon"?  Is it a router?
>    Please clean up.
>
> 2) In Sec 3.2: "The TLV SHOULD be considered an unordered list."  Perhaps
>    "the value contents of the TLV" or something that makes it clearer?
>
> 3) In Sec 4.3: " [RFC7490] proposed method of"  should be
>    "[RFC7490] defines a method of"
>
> 4) In Sec 5, I'm fairly certain that admin tags can leak additional
>    information to an IGP snooper.  It would be useful to have some thoughts
>    about that.
>
> 5) In IANA considerations, please duplicated the suggested value (10) that
>    was mentioned in Sec 3.1
>
> Thanks again for the hard work.  The sooner we resolve whom the editors
> are,
> the sooner this draft can proceed.  Ideally, if updated by Thursday, it
> could enter
> IETF Last Call and make the IESG telechat on Oct 17.
>

Oct 15 that is.



> Regards,
> Alia
>
>
>
>