IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Database Over Flow Query!!

Sina Mirtorabi <sina@CISCO.COM> Thu, 10 October 2002 13:45 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA03808 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:45:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <17.007649F5@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 9:47:14 -0400
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 276880 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:47:14 -0400
Received: from 171.68.227.73 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:47:14 -0400
Received: from SMIRTORAW2K (par-ilm-dhcp1-vl133-19.cisco.com [144.254.54.214]) by fire.cisco.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id g9ADl7018789 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 06:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Importance: Normal
Message-ID: <ECEBIKJEBCOMCBDBKDNBEEHDCDAA.sina@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 06:47:07 -0700
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: Sina Mirtorabi <sina@CISCO.COM>
Subject: Re: Database Over Flow Query!!
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <20021010110536.71082.qmail@web40305.mail.yahoo.com>
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Amit

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mailing List [mailto:OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM]On Behalf Of Amit
> Srivastava
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 4:06 AM
> To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
> Subject: Database Over Flow Query!!
>
>
> Hi All,
>    Actually i was going through the RFC 1765 where in
> it states that when the timer expires the router
> leaves
> OverflowState and begins originating non-default
> AS-external-LSAs again. SO does it mean that it need
> to reoriginate all the flushed self originated
> As-External LSAs again or it means that it is not
> mandatory to originate all the flushed self originated
> non-defualt As-External LSAs but from now on we can
> originate any new self originated LSA.

what do you mean by 'new self originated LSA'? since all non-default type 5
LSA have been flushed out whatever type 5 the router generates can be
considered as 'new instance'

when the router leaves OverflowState after ospfExitOverflowInterval it will
simply reoriginate / originate whatever type 5 it needs to generate, given
that it remains below ospfExtLsdbLimit

Sina



> Please Answer if anyone know the solution.
> Regards
> Amit
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
> http://faith.yahoo.com

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status