Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions (Correct Draft Authors E-mail)
Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 03 June 2016 22:02 UTC
Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E1F12D56D; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 15:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ooEruwivrjlG; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 15:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E37D12D0E9; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 15:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x232.google.com with SMTP id xk1so17783014pac.2; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 15:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z/2RwnDtZEAb/XTwG3HdgRXdBJuqvvYJyoOW3NlryIc=; b=BMTq9RSX3Z6uaEYlQ4iGkPBMUN+rt4n1Eq7jrhKD7Qyo0kVy1MYiokHy2hGv6D3YLz SdUwQC5R2ytyy97Mo3on9F1ZWouciyHHNdPAOWAud1eZzu6J3CGPmoQIa6bi970Eoz5D /1QxAJ86GCojLBYLf17MUpqhQInenVZUO7ecTLFG9UABjGXc+lcHHwWT23LT7p3GarKd 88OWS14wcFMeuqRdsrNL0hKDK68+YjiUypGILdcELr1EEhxgQXseMt6Zd8YDjkat3Srh rSCl4qXUiw/4BUaC5OLkcgDWEtAp6qWsSdMGQZ3ViUkktzFUogEGBpB4xHk4gtjVnBB8 71ww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=z/2RwnDtZEAb/XTwG3HdgRXdBJuqvvYJyoOW3NlryIc=; b=hXNxD5O/SdZzX2FjxSmShYxJGrkt6QVAiqFmkimFqnXwFkpw8vIxo8p/NWo7+Sz1M2 RVYoi0ZvCEIqUwsEm0+/YA2QRPpLKfD/2681fUTdzU/ysx44EfOABicJXX6CCY5gecW8 QnosG3pMFlK/TsM2iP8P3uMKaG8gN2Rsl1DypHo3MZsrljP94uKWrmFMNhyhKxsgzAox VRoK5BXIQ6vc+4kyaQuyr/bp5mKS4yP3PczHoPeIJqWFdCr9B45B8o3GCvL/ZTR/9i0q XYUL4rMLm9Y+0TnOGTmOt8OGtWoZXySExVLYMfEpVTSoRdJmDikWm4n3w6WtUKUaHmeJ mfeQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIiU0LCz3mOQC1x34BA5fygI36LVZflA/5coyirIFpT5idWqa/vKqvdTyOIqihc8w==
X-Received: by 10.66.193.199 with SMTP id hq7mr7525325pac.6.1464991354792; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 15:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.28] ([76.126.247.72]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v1sm10506072pfa.93.2016.06.03.15.02.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 03 Jun 2016 15:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.16.0.160506
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 15:02:33 -0700
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <157A5922-F546-4D6F-BDF1-E139DD3C3997@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions (Correct Draft Authors E-mail)
References: <D375B4D3.631CE%acee@cisco.com> <D37771EE.6347F%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D37771EE.6347F%acee@cisco.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/aN96o7E7hOJI3cGJHo9603XWSYM>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions (Correct Draft Authors E-mail)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 22:02:37 -0000
Hi Acee, I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Thanks, Jeff On 6/3/16, 2:45 PM, "OSPF on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)" <ospf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of acee@cisco.com> wrote: >Authors, > >For the final time, can you confirm whether or not you are aware of any >IPR other than? > >https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2401/ >https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2233/ (the IPR statement on the non-WG >draft version) > >Thanks, >Acee > >On 6/2/16, 10:04 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> wrote: > >>The WG last call ended a couple weeks ago and I will act as document >>shepherd and request publication. >>Thanks, >>Acee >> >>On 5/4/16, 11:41 AM, "OSPF on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)" >><ospf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of acee@cisco.com> wrote: >> >>>The subject draft is very stable, has multiple interoperable >>>implementations, and many (including myself) have done thorough reviews. >>>I >>>believe we are ready for WG last call for this very important draft. >>> >>>With great pleasure, this begins the WG last call for the subject draft. >>>Please send your comments to this list prior to 12:00 AM GMT, May 19th, >>>2016. >>> >>>Here is a URL for your convenance: >>> >>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensio >>>n >>>s >>>/ >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Acee >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>OSPF mailing list >>>OSPF@ietf.org >>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >> > >_______________________________________________ >OSPF mailing list >OSPF@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
- [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extension… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Peter Psenak
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Rob Shakir
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Dolganow, Andrew (Nokia - SG)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Rob Shakir
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Hannes Gredler
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Peter Psenak
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
- [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extension… Clarence Filsfils