IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-03

Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net> Sat, 13 December 2014 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <shraddha@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F94B1A1AC8 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 10:19:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yLMD52TWdLUP for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 10:19:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0796.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::796]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E84D11A1A78 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 10:19:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.107.139) by BY1PR0501MB1384.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.107.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.36.22; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 18:19:28 +0000
Received: from BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.107.139]) by BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.107.139]) with mapi id 15.01.0031.000; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 18:19:28 +0000
From: Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>
To: "draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-03
Thread-Index: AdAW/kuWGscufT8EQDeA0Yv5U29aiw==
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 18:19:28 +0000
Message-ID: <BY1PR0501MB1381D2E0190364379D1752B1D5610@BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.17]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1384;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1384;
x-forefront-prvs: 04244E0DC5
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(189002)(199003)(54206007)(40100003)(54606007)(77156002)(62966003)(74316001)(33656002)(19625215002)(92566001)(101416001)(2656002)(86362001)(19300405004)(16236675004)(122556002)(46102003)(87936001)(54356999)(50986999)(99396003)(19580395003)(4396001)(21056001)(120916001)(64706001)(20776003)(99286002)(66066001)(110136001)(230783001)(106356001)(105586002)(76576001)(97736003)(229853001)(107046002)(15975445007)(2351001)(68736005)(31966008)(102836002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1384; H:BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY1PR0501MB1381D2E0190364379D1752B1D5610BY1PR0501MB1381_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Dec 2014 18:19:28.3761 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY1PR0501MB1384
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/aUcFeWMlVMyNbR9Y5D_mSBLTjpk
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-03
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 18:19:54 -0000

Authors,

        When there are multiple parallel links between two nodes, it is useful to
Group them into different bundles and use each bundle for load-balancing  for different traffic flows.

What we have in adjacency sid is just a flag to indicate that the label is a "set label" by setting a flag
In adj-sid TLV. It serves the purpose when all the parallel links  are in one bundle but not sufficient when
There can be different bundles and different labels for each of them.
An identifier for the group, probably "group-id" is needed to associate the label with the interface group.

Any thoughts on this?

Rgds
Shraddha

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email