Re: [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Correct file appended

"Vishwas Manral" <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 17 November 2006 18:07 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gl87f-0000DX-AK; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:07:31 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gl87e-0000DS-Gc for ospf@ietf.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:07:30 -0500
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.238]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gl87a-0004RH-6s for ospf@ietf.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:07:30 -0500
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h29so1027462wxd for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 10:07:26 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MeR4UT4v59xKksvYpAQl9WzUBaQmhf1P81PiDkNpBrmwBwIRolzJYvehkxyhMtskX8cBsxVN5ypAzmZcaCjo3ls+D5BNNPYq4UlcwfjyG8BxeHiCPmm8ugtpPNuhHiWSa76Q71lXv8wp52HSufA9Pynp3m6/OX64MHCIaX65oZM=
Received: by 10.70.52.1 with SMTP id z1mr3552979wxz.1163786845514; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 10:07:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.70.33.14 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 10:07:25 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <77ead0ec0611171007m6c12e615m5daeadcefdf73bb8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 10:07:25 -0800
From: "Vishwas Manral" <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "John Smith" <jsmith4112003@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Correct file appended
In-Reply-To: <20061117173223.65582.qmail@web27204.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20061117173223.65582.qmail@web27204.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 31247fb3be228bb596db9127becad0bc
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org

Thanks for the support John.

I guess we need to ask the WG chairs what they want us to do. As far
as I see it there has been some consensus on the drafts on this list.

Thanks,
Vishwas

On 11/17/06, John Smith <jsmith4112003@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> I am willing to accept the SHA authentication draft as a WG item.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "Bhatia, Manav (Manav)" <manav@lucent.com>
> To: Phil Cowburn <phil.cowburn@gmail.com>; Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
> Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
> Sent: Friday, 17 November, 2006 2:31:24 PM
> Subject: RE: [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Correct file appended
>
>
> Hi Phil,
>
> > >    Some discussion on list already
> > >
> > >    Crypto - only md5 to date, can be attacked, some want
> > stronger algs
> > >         perhaps should specify these
> > >
> > >    How - 2328 can add other algs w/o too much problem
> >
> > Yes it does, but debugging would be a nightmare! :-)
> >
> > Let me not trigger a discussion again, i am ok with using the existing
> > type code!
>
> We had posted the revised text based on the comments that we had
> received both on the list and offline and there was quite a discussion
> that followed!
>
> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/current/mail6.html
>
> The consensus that we all had reached on was that before this draft one
> could only have a key mismatch. From this draft onwards we will have a
> key/algorithm mismatch.
>
> [clipped]
>
> >
> > >
> >
> > I dont see any show stopper comments, so what is the status of the
> > auth drafts? There was a discussion on these drafts some time back and
> > the consensus was that the drafts would not be changed and we would
> > reuse the existing type code for additional authentication types.
> >
> > If there are no further comments then should these be taken
> > up as a new items?
>
> Yes we would like to progress these drafts as a WG items.
>
> Cheers,
> Manav
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail. "The New Version is radically easier to use" – The Wall Street Journal
> http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf