Re: [OSPF] OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-12
"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Mon, 10 April 2017 16:38 UTC
Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048CC129A98
for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id mNF8rpK-kpWl for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E2D3129AA7
for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6746; q=dns/txt; s=iport;
t=1491842319; x=1493051919;
h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:
mime-version; bh=LSYxf+ys7fQINgxKfxpTWHS4V9krLamBdedYqiwwHFA=;
b=NawUgcvU6KZ8Lj+cMFQdZE0ew9gXA0+t31UoKSnUsFNeuf0yGsUJpqiq
eKHWRjHCCSmJHPNkvppz1TzFZK8vbTyYEX7GHlKJT3gecvWjbKe+2zKXk
beNl2kRX+mdAAxrgj+AeDJ0EYoql/v3RjA0rVlKPPwoqMAdb4LNlGK9J5 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AZAQCptOtY/4sNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?=
=?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBgm5lYYELB41ykUeQI4U0gg8uhXYCg2M/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRU?=
=?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAx0QXAIBCBEEAQEoBzIUCQgCBAESCIoHDqsuin0BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?=
=?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEYBYZQhHCFDIUvBZYghlsBhn+LUIIIhS6KFJN/AR84gQVbFUGFEIF?=
=?us-ascii?q?KdYhSgQ0BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,182,1488844800";
d="scan'208,217";a="229048810"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139])
by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA;
10 Apr 2017 16:38:36 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com (xch-rcd-015.cisco.com [173.37.102.25])
by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3AGcabd010809
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL)
for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:38:36 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) by XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com
(173.37.102.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 10 Apr
2017 11:38:35 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com
([173.36.7.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000;
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:38:35 -0500
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing -
draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-12
Thread-Index: AQHSshLkc67Le7Ln0kWp9vFuhTIew6G+zXsg
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:38:35 +0000
Message-ID: <923b35e070cf4b82bc86fdd9adcbf7eb@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <D5112334.A80B7%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D5112334.A80B7%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.67.234]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_923b35e070cf4b82bc86fdd9adcbf7ebXCHALN001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/awjIcnN1Pv50qhNsd3AauPEhtow>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing -
draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-12
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>,
<mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>,
<mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:38:42 -0000
Support. There are multiple implementations. Les From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 8:56 AM To: OSPF WG List Subject: [OSPF] OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-12 This begins the WG last call for the subject draft. Please send your support and/or comments to this list prior to 12:00 AM GMT, May 1st, 2017. As is traditional for with more complex OSPF WG documents. We are allowing for a 3 week WG last call. For your convenience, here is the URL for the subject document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions Thanks, Acee
- Re: [OSPF] OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - … Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - … Jeff Tantsura
- [OSPF] OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draf… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - … Peter Psenak
- Re: [OSPF] OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - … Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [OSPF] OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - … Ketan Talaulikar Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: [OSPF] OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [OSPF] OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - … Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - … Acee Lindem (acee)