Re: new LSA
Naiming Shen <naiming@REDBACK.COM> Thu, 15 August 2002 07:34 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA15907 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 03:34:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <2.006D6023@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 3:35:28 -0400
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 109183 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 03:35:25 -0400
Received: from 155.53.12.9 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 03:35:25 -0400
Received: from redback.com (yoo-hoo.redback.com [155.53.12.43]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50826F2C58; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 00:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20020815073527.50826F2C58@prattle.redback.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 00:35:27 -0700
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: Naiming Shen <naiming@REDBACK.COM>
Subject: Re: new LSA
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: Mail from Erblichs <erblichs@EARTHLINK.NET> dated Thu, 15 Aug 2002 00:19:46 PDT <3D5B5612.D3F43030@earthlink.net>
Precedence: list
I can think of some ways to use this info. For example, if we know there is a link down from that new LSA, then we may want to trigger an immediate calculation for the fast convergence purpose; if we know there is an interface IP address change, who cares, data usually are not forwarded to a backbone link anyway, we'll run the spf when we have spare time; if we know A to B has two ECMP links and one of them is up/down, there is nothing needs to be done, since even we re-run the calculation, the results are got to be the same. Now whether if people want to take such an "active" approach is up to the implementors. we can argue either ways to the pros and cons. cheers. ] Acee, ] ] Then what would / could you do with this information? Could it ] be useful in anyway? Have you ever heard of anyone really ] interested in this type of information? ] ] Mitchell Erblich ] ====================== ] ] ] Acee Lindem wrote: ] > ] > Erblichs wrote: ] > ] > > Acee, ] > > ] > > Lets assume that we modify the LSA comparison code sections ] > > and we keep the older LSA versions for a short time assuming ] > > we have the memory available. ] > ] > Mitchell, ] > ] > Wasn't the original question whether this could be done without the ] > previous LSA? ] > ] > > ] > > What would you say we can now do with this additional informatio n? ] > ] > If you had the previous LSA you could definitely determine what had ] > changed between the two versions. ] > ] > > ] > > Mitchell Erblich ] > > =================== ] > > ] > > ] > > Acee Lindem wrote: ] > > ] > >>Beatriz Silva wrote: ] > >> ] > >> ] > >>>Hi everybody ! ] > >>> ] > >>>I would like to know if it is possible (in OSPF v2) to identify, just b y examining the LSA, what is the change the LSA is signaling. I want to identif y if for example an router LSA was sent because the cost of one of the links wa s changed, or if it was because one of the links went down .... This, without h aving the previous LSAs, just by looking at the newly received LSA. Is it possi ble ? How ? ] > >>> ] > >>> ] > >>Beatriz, ] > >> ] > >>AFAIK, there is no way to determine what has changed without a previous version ] > >>of the LSA. ] > >> ] > >> ] > >>>Thank you very much, ] > >>>Beatriz ] > >>> ] > >>>-- ] > >>>__________________________________________________________ ] > >>>Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com ] > >>>http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup ] > >>> ] > >>> ] > >>> ] > >>-- ] > >>Acee ] > >> ] > > ] > ] > -- ] > Acee - Naiming
- new LSA Beatriz Silva
- Re: new LSA Acee Lindem
- Re: new LSA Erblichs
- Re: new LSA Acee Lindem
- Re: new LSA Erblichs
- Re: new LSA Naiming Shen
- Re: new LSA Manral, Vishwas
- Re: new LSA Acee Lindem
- Re: new LSA Dave Katz
- Re: new LSA Manral, Vishwas
- Re: new LSA Dave Katz
- Re: new LSA Naiming Shen
- Re: new LSA Erblichs
- Database Over Flow Query!! Amit Srivastava
- Re: Database Over Flow Query!! Sina Mirtorabi
- Re: Database Over Flow Query!! Amit Srivastava
- Re: Database Over Flow Query!! Sina Mirtorabi