IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] draft-ppsenak-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 30 March 2017 19:27 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D5712940F for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.197, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y9WqoUWKP0A2 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x235.google.com (mail-it0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A73C5126B72 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x235.google.com with SMTP id 190so315223itm.0 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=fLppW+ixuqJZLv8N8JxTsyeFFglDclXXy2NJplQxNs4=; b=sQp8fNJ4kgTsgTLSrPBD+DlwCGcr695UsbIOoOKXH+jBXJ8t6PsNqH+aEB3foFa4Q5 XQBrHrZlIC2matfEDWCFY1xD7YDna+vft21/JzTgfXJbwHupKMliY5J07AzFZJRDeD2W MPxPuVkbOv/JfA2WgqKbRnc4LzpoUF5O2xR4p561ziKEXeqEPkTjH11t3IKGmmzlTeRJ mXD1dtEgmg14x7E6If/2BKdDEo46xBqT1uN2SaCDeiK57hr6q6F7p0shpTi6PqWIstC+ 3oYWHQ+LYNKNcF3rWUbLZvUwuWwtT8eUOyVe0NgOFKdslIYHHNYhlmls3YbKqE9A4tJS zmjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fLppW+ixuqJZLv8N8JxTsyeFFglDclXXy2NJplQxNs4=; b=OnNqIXegdO6ZWFjQWG52WY6dUYF7qltLGmwWW03NnaWwVBI/ka054xv+8t7PDSM3lb BZtUU7EdHeGG+tqqPygmgEv3CXHIGa/oZfIf01j0l/0M4y9ysO0qujxh4dbat6l0B2oB ZI+9SDRmJeb+R8aMFxXznibD44niFPcEVbFu139Dmc0yskB2mWFrqbDo1tH6TfGIqxEK cUHR94IkfPMj6THsoFSm2eJnUgrUL31cyaxbUO63cV2S1/OrZ6zHJGPY8o8td3+XxTR3 HEdEMuNX/DPmt+I2KvTzS+BMpDnvu0Ev3XS60+bVFhU8Ci6DwM4Y++UXGCiRivrsjT+z 6OWg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0RBpVGd2k6/7YDD28lOx1RVtuf7oYX/8LFMFVT4+pP+t5M98FBPq6jW7qRoo2wLoR9VpdMMIJT8pYXBA==
X-Received: by 10.36.43.78 with SMTP id h75mr2542508ita.25.1490902018025; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.79.90.71 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.79.90.71 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rdKUd7VgoVq9hRhbaGAmoY9qX_KJh8teEqVTkFPHMVfNQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+b+ERkC4h4FY8zrFwbED-hWcQ8YkCOa_zfya6J50pOmSBnFiA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERm3vebcL2ft_g4870uRN9S_VkXR_-JAWdqueQsPGyFhQQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=KwTOcwsvuoBoD3eim7dkMgSfUtdX-z6B2dU9dmP0aeg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERkKj=VKNSLW=A_gurMZtZ-sFtvHZdB8r1mTTz77LOcWBg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERnrVPJyw8RmvD6+3td2eE2q4KZ4-LkcVxL9pk9Km0EK=A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERmdFbg_cFjysHQwkLY-+i1ERL9u+hEeVThStkhEi9gYxw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=+UNUtzamduonsTs3WkZsadSCCa_-6dMb6DCvwyTMDRQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAG4d1rdKUd7VgoVq9hRhbaGAmoY9qX_KJh8teEqVTkFPHMVfNQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:26:57 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Fa_VP5L0oKfxxAz6qbmNEj6F-qs
Message-ID: <CA+b+ER=vqmp3BjTnD2S3knwLeTWUQMdeCT99FhJ+8fWnHS851w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1146f4262deec1054bf7adfe"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/bjqmwTs_EOMQZrKNIS_8ZI9i7VA>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] draft-ppsenak-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:27:01 -0000

Seems like we have different understanding on rough consensus .. but let's
leave that one aside.

What are technical objections to draft-ppsenak-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse ?

I have not heard even single one so far.

Stefan's suggestion for indirection rather the bitfield is clearly not a
technical objection but good debate when draft becomes a WG document ?

Cheers,
R.

On Mar 30, 2017 3:19 PM, "Alia Atlas" <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:

> Robert,
>
> Take a read through RFC 7282.  Consensus calls aren't about majority rules.
> It is about hearing technical objections and understanding and responding
> to them.
> It is quite quite clear that there are technical objections to either
> solution.
>
> Regards,
> Alia
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Based on the discussion so far I see that:
>>
>> A) producing use case document will only delay things further as each use
>> case presented will be questioned as possible already today via MTR, MI,
>> building new separate network etc ...
>>
>> B) WG members in majority support adoption of draft-ppsenak-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse.
>> Can we get at least sense in the room who is in support of which draft ?
>>
>> Thx,
>> R.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSPF mailing list
>> OSPF@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>>
>>
>

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email