[OSPF] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 28 August 2017 10:40 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap@ietf.org, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, ospf-chairs@ietf.org, acee@cisco.com, ospf@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150391681287.9966.12112533544527482697.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 03:40:12 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/buwtnaxNSRiLfAEYVFCkTP-cpec>
Subject: [OSPF] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-i?= =?utf-8?q?etf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with the gen-art review (Thanks Pete!) that the new registry should
point to the RFCs that define the actually Sub-TLV (behavior). I would simply
recommend to reference both RFCs, this document and the respective other
RFC/draft that defines the details.

[OSPF] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ie… Mirja Kühlewind