[OSPF] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Suresh Krishnan <[e-mail]>]

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

* There seems to be an difference between this document's definition of
sub-TLVs (with 2 octet types and lengths) and those of RFC5512 (with 1 octet
types and lengths). So I am surprised to see the document point to the RFC5512
based TLVs for both syntax and semantics (Sections 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 ...) . Can you
please explain how these sub-TLVs are encoded on the wire to be compatible with
this draft?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

* IANA considerations

Looks like the value 65535 is included both as experimental and reserved. Suggest changing

OLD:
65500-65535    Experimental                              This document

NEW:
65500-65534    Experimental                              This document