Re: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Sun, 25 January 2015 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BAA51A0389 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:18:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dtq4jR_Ne9zQ for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:18:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 435411A037C for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:18:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1108; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1422213510; x=1423423110; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=I8NuNHYiEGoc135wBfYU7q9yVLn9g5gy4q/EO7gWIe8=; b=A7qcUDkV3QzqNcg+dh12dY+UOFmfL5Cfb/jgnkH+GT6TLewTnF7DtCH9 J5PDQ5csr8VY0iz/rxpSbIF6SxFMJRyhMzMQd30MHMPJ+dEF1R3iNygx/ Q48XGHJSLQuyt03ZPY1klMuV06/u7p75qLCivWf6RF5cRc+weXx9rAJ/D o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnUFAINAxVStJA2I/2dsb2JhbABagwZSWQTGKwqHAkMBAQEBAX2EDQEBBAEBATc0HQEINjcLJwQBEgmIIw3RdAEBAQcBAQEBAR2UKAWObokhgRWCf4prgz0igjKBPG8BgUN+AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,464,1418083200"; d="scan'208";a="391009630"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2015 19:18:29 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com [173.37.183.87]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0PJITBo017646 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 25 Jan 2015 19:18:29 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.144]) by xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com ([173.37.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 13:18:29 -0600
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>, Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental
Thread-Index: AQHQONOy49S+oqs3gEq89Qk7UUC3nw==
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 19:18:28 +0000
Message-ID: <D0EAAAAB.C3D6%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <08A3165A168CFA4D84B19AB87EDB1BA0@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/cIjLRh-T2JqgUSGjQt5u-Ah3j-g>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 19:18:32 -0000

We have sufficient support for the TTZ work and will accept it an
experimental protocol extension.

Huaimo - please reissue the draft as draft-ietf-ospf-ttz-00.txt.

Thanks,
Acee and Abhay

On 1/10/15, 4:09 PM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> wrote:

>
>We have discussed OSPF TTZ at several IETFs and the authors and their
>colleagues have even developed a working prototype. We believe there is
>consensus that the protocol mechanisms are viable. However, there is
>disagreement as to whether or not these mechanisms will provide
>significant benefit. The answer is definitely topology and deployment
>dependent. After some discussion, we have decided to poll for adoption as
>an experimental draft. Please indicate your support or opposition WG
>adoption as experimental prior to January 24th, 2015.
>
>For your convenience, here is a URL for the draft:
>
>http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-chen-ospf-ttz-09.txt
>
>Thanks,
>Acee and Abhay 
>
>_______________________________________________
>OSPF mailing list
>OSPF@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf