[OSPF] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-12: (with COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Thu, 18 January 2018 16:41 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, ospf-chairs@ietf.org, acee@cisco.com, ospf@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151629366736.20596.6495227203632608509.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:41:07 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/cfqWOCUjvq6vf9fqsseuRJJpH34>
Subject: [OSPF] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-12: (with COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think this document would be clearer if the example in S 7.1 were
in the intro. I was scratching my head a bit at the beginning and
then got to 7.1 and it made more sense.

[OSPF] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf… Eric Rescorla
Re: [OSPF] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-… Shraddha Hegde
Re: [OSPF] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-… Eric Rescorla
Re: [OSPF] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-… Shraddha Hegde
Re: [OSPF] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-… Eric Rescorla