IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 19 January 2015 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31781B2AFD for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:23:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WfFKh_V4nEpw for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:23:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E9E41B2AE7 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:23:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=715; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1421684603; x=1422894203; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=WX2nJuJksyx3pWEwF+ZxP+drSbh5owutcazY6XwEaIE=; b=mBrrLRRlY0dAD5M1PTgt33AQUQNPu+WXR8tqJ5xV3gUZptEftJn9bOXY mR19t1e3JeY13vMVvKHqAIp0Y8KUXeKjL9TKkff5ZKrfpo49nng1o3ngj E9Q9WWOSxBuqGlV87EiUu4aZroeZLgzlQQpE2XI40pcLF3JMs++zhVmFg A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlwFAEcuvVStJA2D/2dsb2JhbABbgwZSTg7GOAqHFUMBAQEBAX2EDQEBBAEBATc0HQEINgUyCycEARKILA3PCgEBAQEBBQEBAQEBAQEXBJQpBY5ZiReBFIJ8il2DPSKCMoE8b4FFfgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,427,1418083200"; d="scan'208";a="114627714"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Jan 2015 16:23:22 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com [173.37.183.87]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0JGNMYk026196 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:23:22 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.144]) by xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com ([173.37.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:23:21 -0600
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03
Thread-Index: AQHQNAQ9vsnvlotD/ke88qgwnizA6g==
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:23:21 +0000
Message-ID: <D0E2995E.BE6C%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.197]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <EB01A14383C0CE4394E256339F984AC7@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/dCpOZeGo-IWbJIOntXq3xPwc41o>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:23:24 -0000

We will accept the OSPF MRT extensions as a WG document. Progression will
parallel that of the base documents in the RTG WG.
Thanks,
Acee 

On 11/3/14, 9:20 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> wrote:

>The base MRT specifications are rtgwg WG documents. Additionally, this
>document now uses the OSPFv2 link extensions that we have converged upon
>for OSPFv2 protocol extension. Hence, the chairs believe this document is
>ready for a WG adoption poll.
>
>Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG
>Document.
>
>Regards,
>-Abhay
>
>_______________________________________________
>OSPF mailing list
>OSPF@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email