Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions (Correct Draft Authors E-mail)
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 02 June 2016 14:04 UTC
Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D18D12D701; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 07:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n2ol1fF9zlk1; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 07:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2857112D6FA; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 07:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1236; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1464876249; x=1466085849; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=KGnr8AVeDYmUcrAqdfhktgr4QfN7foklcOQ4/12GpDY=; b=FmLU3XYOLQe6rgXTRQwXbHGZrDdOUcdevKhozM+Jg+8MmzKX0n98q/Ra kj14asKxKHVi9DxFBkbBGEdX8IbgKyrmTeF/ziLTh77ddImbj6DidRnle 7Z3UdO1jeFtCswaWcjfrgZ4LpxP9UgHYyoO6d6RizDJ4XZUIBG3RvTlDe 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ABAgDrO1BX/5tdJa1dgzpWbw4GuimBeRcNhW4egR04FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RGAQEEAQEBGgYROgsSAQgaAh8HAgQlCxUSBAENBYgvDrBXkSkBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgQGJc4RAgwGCWQWYNwGFf4gggWmET4hkj0sBHjaCOYE1bol9fwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,406,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="109050758"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jun 2016 14:04:08 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u52E47Ie016735 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 2 Jun 2016 14:04:08 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:04:07 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:04:07 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions (Correct Draft Authors E-mail)
Thread-Index: AQHRvNegieQTrbGfhUKI6yZAyuKmpg==
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 14:04:07 +0000
Message-ID: <D375B4D3.631CE%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <E5DA0FA65B95834185B9204B99F02D49@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/dpVz94ymmBrdezvLtQmF97Sl1Vo>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions (Correct Draft Authors E-mail)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 14:04:13 -0000
The WG last call ended a couple weeks ago and I will act as document shepherd and request publication. Thanks, Acee On 5/4/16, 11:41 AM, "OSPF on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)" <ospf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of acee@cisco.com> wrote: >The subject draft is very stable, has multiple interoperable >implementations, and many (including myself) have done thorough reviews. I >believe we are ready for WG last call for this very important draft. > >With great pleasure, this begins the WG last call for the subject draft. >Please send your comments to this list prior to 12:00 AM GMT, May 19th, >2016. > >Here is a URL for your convenance: > >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extension >s >/ > >Thanks, >Acee > >_______________________________________________ >OSPF mailing list >OSPF@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
- [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extension… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Peter Psenak
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Rob Shakir
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Dolganow, Andrew (Nokia - SG)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Rob Shakir
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Hannes Gredler
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Peter Psenak
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
- [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extension… Clarence Filsfils