[OSPF] Implementation Survey for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 28 July 2017 19:20 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCBAA131D03 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 12:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PbblPcbI5rFe for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 12:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF191131C6E for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 12:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3517; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1501269644; x=1502479244; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=OmwB11e1kj1+R/f0q1kpoU7cE5VPbIZG2qTLZnRfROo=; b=Wz9CehJnsvZWB2U2uUaCRIqAAJmlRenjTNflPbsFR7J/IttfcCw5K2FS pv4LhLTn5PlQLtOzuxw7Y/6J0ynP3dfuqL+vHqSvL/3EssQAidjNoTMGT URzNXRrh98BTCIOa2urzJ4pk8H+SAYZ+eSZId97mMZyN/1yrqV3FX//RP 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AqAQATjntZ/4UNJK1cGgEBAQECAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QgBAQEBgm9rgX+OBo95kkeFL4IShUccg1k/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohTcLVhIBDAE?= =?us-ascii?q?9AgQwJwQBDYlQZLBJgiaLPgEBAQEBAQEDAQEBAQEBAQEBH4MokFuCYQWfbQKUJ?= =?us-ascii?q?IIMhVKKXmKVDwEfOIEKdxWHYologQ4BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,427,1496102400"; d="scan'208,217";a="462411258"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 28 Jul 2017 19:20:44 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v6SJKhuS013750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 28 Jul 2017 19:20:44 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:20:43 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:20:43 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <dirk.goethals@nokia.com>, Veerendranatha Reddy Vallem <veerendranatharv@huawei.com>
CC: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Implementation Survey for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs
Thread-Index: AQHTB9abJ7R2HustMkGaN9m2tsKMnQ==
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 19:20:42 +0000
Message-ID: <D5A106C6.BA8B2%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D5A106C6BA8B2aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/eVo7w5T_ZY0_D3emzgNwpzyBeEI>
Subject: [OSPF] Implementation Survey for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 19:20:47 -0000

Hi Dirk, Veeru,

Please respond to the implementation survey questions below.

  1. Does your implementation support for all 9 OSPFv3 Extended LSAs?

  2. Does your implementation support for N-Bit Prefix Option?

  3. Does your implementation support OSPFv3 Extended LSAs across the entire routing domain?

  4. Does your implementation support per-area deployment of OSPF Extended LSAs (AS-External LSAs are legacy)?

  5. Does your implementation support full deployment of OSPFv3 Extended LSAs?

  6. Does your implementation support sparse mode deployment of OSPFv3 Extended LSAs?

  7. Does your implementation support any applications that make use of OSPFv3 Extended LSAs (e.g., Segment Routing)?

  8. Have you done any interoperability testing with other implementations?


Thanks,
Acee