IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] IANA Considerations in draft-ietf-ospf-rfc4970bis

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Mon, 21 September 2015 22:32 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E171ACD6B; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 15:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8RraFM5ZhG7Y; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 15:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D652C1ACD5D; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 15:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=309; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1442874753; x=1444084353; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=AR8EemWjmDyuEgnGhNityx2mbPYN7CbmhjnZ0P7uuz8=; b=beh63MZkZSw+JAmXUGy5mMkVIG9yGb2lzw2ow3xoiZTA6Z+tyaTEqvHA XywmLDrtmCZBTpjuPVHmco5xMLU26vdElW1abGAnuPSQUtpJmiS2Ehvyy RpicfUE1SvKQXum0VlFcb63oZdV/MTBBzyrD1/z8yIY7fB8aIqulmdVlX I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ASAgDhhABW/5FdJa1dgySBLg+9TAENh3QCgTU4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQkAQEBAwF5BQsCAQgYLjIlAgQOBYgmCMtiAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYhnMBgg6CboRaMweDGIEUAQSSO4MpAY0GmxofAQFChAFxiW0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,569,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="190220101"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Sep 2015 22:32:32 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (xch-rcd-019.cisco.com [173.37.102.29]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t8LMWWCe009749 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 21 Sep 2015 22:32:32 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-019.cisco.com (173.37.102.29) by XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (173.37.102.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:32:31 -0500
Received: from xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com (173.37.183.80) by xch-rcd-019.cisco.com (173.37.102.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:32:31 -0500
Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.98]) by xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([173.37.183.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:32:31 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] IANA Considerations in draft-ietf-ospf-rfc4970bis
Thread-Index: AQHQ9LRhm+JodERs+k6Wx1tPPyBAAJ5H1ZoA///CrAD///ke1g==
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 22:32:30 +0000
Message-ID: <54C1B2D0-B9D3-4125-A19C-5705359C8367@cisco.com>
References: <D225EE98.D2A0B%aretana@cisco.com> <CAG4d1rdHd=raBDqBKtBNMp+-W6imTRaN76aSOZPKc_O3mJRk6A@mail.gmail.com>, <D225F4AB.2F280%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D225F4AB.2F280%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/f9eL1U7-f006MLSPg0TR4dTffuE>
Cc: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-rfc4970bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-rfc4970bis@ietf.org>, "ospf-chairs@ietf.org" <ospf-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] IANA Considerations in draft-ietf-ospf-rfc4970bis
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 22:32:34 -0000

..

> On Sep 21, 2015, at 5:57 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> If we are going to change this, I would propose we change the allocation policy from “Standards Action” to “IETF Review”  as opposed to splitting the range. 

That works for me.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email