IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] TTZ, my 2c

Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com> Tue, 09 July 2013 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3BC21F9CC5 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.459
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.459 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.140, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32PijeJvJ5Oe for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg21.ericsson.net (usevmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77E821F9CEB for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c6180641-b7f986d000007a82-e7-51dc62d37704
Received: from EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.93]) by usevmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 6F.A6.31362.3D26CD15; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 21:21:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB101.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.118]) by EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.93]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 15:21:53 -0400
From: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>, OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] TTZ, my 2c
Thread-Index: AQHOfMnOtZyOItm20U63AYeh+vEA55lcfpUAgAB7toD//4z3gA==
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 19:21:55 +0000
Message-ID: <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE4719D5EE@eusaamb101.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <BBD66FD99311804F80324E8139B3C94E27C2CB7F@xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.135]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <51F4005CA8B8414EAB3AFE1C74464CEE@ericsson.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPrO6VpDuBBkteM1r8/bmV0aLl3j12 ByaPKb83snosWfKTKYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugStj+mLjgkauivWLzzI2MP5m72Lk5JAQMJG4 +ugWM4QtJnHh3nq2LkYuDiGBo4wS7+93sEI4yxglNh96yQpSxSagI/H80T+wDhEBH4nmuytY QGxhATmJZ0sOs0LE5SXmf97OBGE7SRz+PBOsnkVAReLXtVNAGzg4eAW8JR5vFwYJcwr4Sny6 vBmsnBHoiO+n1oDZzALiEreezGeCOE5AYsme81CHikq8fPwPbJWogJ5E27EzUM8oS3yf84gF oldHYsHuT2wQtrXEjTfvoGxtiWULX4PN4RUQlDg58wnLBEaxWUjWzULSPgtJ+ywk7bOQtC9g ZF3FyFFanFqWm25kuIkRGDvHJNgcdzAu+GR5iFGag0VJnHeD3plAIYH0xJLU7NTUgtSi+KLS nNTiQ4xMHJxSDYz6U7PfbpimaZ5z2alCQnvhR94C1365hR6KqXv3rJogyvvSrFb8ZdXRnMPe U+s2L9BS0HB/Jn5d09b82c8w0wfT+ES/P0k4/niZPZt6fpjJvWWf3D0Yfxu5dy6sU97N6rDs dYSnSpfPxFtvJ/qxvzx0KPDPu5wv1luPiDgsYPdxTd3Vo+X1W1mJpTgj0VCLuag4EQDNZ7RB awIAAA==
Subject: Re: [OSPF] TTZ, my 2c
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 19:22:46 -0000

Speaking as WG Member:

I agree with Hannes that the OSPF technology scales well. However, I don't
want to rule out future improvements in the broad scope of use cases TTZ
purports to address.
Thanks,
Acee

On 7/9/13 12:13 PM, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> wrote:

>On 7/9/13 2:50 PM, "Acee Lindem" <acee.lindem@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
>>In summary, I'm not against looking at use cases as Russ and Alvaro
>>proposed. However, I'm not convinced TTZ buys you any advantage in any
>>use
>>case.
>
>Acee:
>
>Maybe my suggestion wasn't clear.
>
>Do you think that any of the TTZ-related use cases (not just the ones in
>the applicability draft, but maybe other similar ones) need to be solved?
>I'm not asking whether you think TTZ can solve any of them or whether you
>like that way it may solve them..  I'm asking whether you (or anyone else)
>think that there are issues that need to be solved somehow.  The intent
>would be to then solve them.
>
>Note that TTZ is a potential solution to a set of issues.  Maybe not the
>best or only solution, but without having a set of requirements/use cases
>to measure against it may be hard to decide which solution to use..if
>there is even a problem, or other solutions..
>
>Alvaro.
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email