Re: OSPFv3 - Editorial

"Manral, Vishwas" <VishwasM@NETPLANE.COM> Tue, 24 June 2003 13:10 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA14949 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:10:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <11.00A2DD74@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 9:10:39 -0400
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 46458054 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:10:38 -0400
Received: from 129.188.136.100 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:10:38 -0400
Received: from az33exr02.mot.com (az33exr02.mot.com [10.64.251.232]) by motgate.mot.com (Motorola/Motgate) with ESMTP id h5ODAbvg023216 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 06:10:37 -0700 (MST)
Received: from xover.corp.mot.com (xover.corp.mot.com [10.1.148.18]) by az33exr02.mot.com (Motorola/az33exr02) with ESMTP id h5ODAZoT016836 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:10:36 -0500
Received: by xover.corp.mot.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <NNKYZB0P>; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:10:16 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-ID: <E7E13AAF2F3ED41197C100508BD6A328DD454A@india_exch.corp.mot.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:11:44 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: "Manral, Vishwas" <VishwasM@NETPLANE.COM>
Subject: Re: OSPFv3 - Editorial
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list

Hi Vivek,

I have seen the typos before, but they don't seem them on the errata page
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.html .

You can send the corrections to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org

Thanks,
Vishwas

-----Original Message-----
From: Vivek Dubey [mailto:vivek_ospf@REDIFFMAIL.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 15:35
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Subject: OSPFv3 - Editorial


If already taken care pls ignore.


2.1.  Protocol processing per-link, not per-subnet:

should generally be "relaced "
>replaced


2.7.  Packet format changes
Two option bits, the "R-bit" and the "V6-bit", ......
but diagrams belonging to another protocol family may be
forwarded

>datagrams

3.1.2.  The Interface Data structure
Interface ID
and the router-LSA originated by the router-LSA for...

>should be originated by the router for ....



thanks,
vivek
___________________________________________________
Get www. mycompany .com and 5 matching email ids.
Just Rs. 1499/ year.
Click here http://www.rediffmailpro.com