Re: [OSPF] IPR Call for "OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing" - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-12
"Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com> Sun, 09 April 2017 19:52 UTC
Return-Path: <sprevidi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D54D1276AF;
Sun, 9 Apr 2017 12:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id xaTCVNpreu_6; Sun, 9 Apr 2017 12:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75C3E126CC7;
Sun, 9 Apr 2017 12:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1878; q=dns/txt; s=iport;
t=1491767563; x=1492977163;
h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references:
in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version;
bh=6jW3UtTiYjCRK4w/gCZPmjDN0HYttpEFaW2HRsqUECE=;
b=kicq3ms6HatzSDOzcExuH9rJ00GxN30KvHK7fz+lE4Urcf5RAmQKLN7+
RiB/r1qSv/9qGnavi36lEbiVJJIoj6WDqdkAlqfA1lW8wv7vlAss9cAa4
832Y4a/W5YkikPWtflUM7eEipdf0GYtfS0U5C6g2nwElUlcKUJnypUchc I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AVAQBMkOpY/5pdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?=
=?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBg1NheRIHjXKRQIgajT2CDy6FdgIag0Q/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRU?=
=?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAgEdBhFFBQsCAQgRAwECAQICHwcCAgIfERUICAIEDgWJdwMNCA6oFIImh?=
=?us-ascii?q?yINgy0BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYELhUWCBYJrglFGgT8Xgm8ugjE?=
=?us-ascii?q?FnEA7AYZ/hxyEPYF/hS6KFIsAiH8BHzhLOlsVUgGEfoFKdYd7gQ0BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,179,1488844800"; d="scan'208";a="233836353"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154])
by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
09 Apr 2017 19:52:42 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (xch-rtp-014.cisco.com [64.101.220.154])
by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v39Jqgoc012822
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL);
Sun, 9 Apr 2017 19:52:42 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-010.cisco.com (64.101.220.150) by XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com
(64.101.220.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3;
Sun, 9 Apr 2017 15:52:41 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-010.cisco.com ([64.101.220.150]) by
XCH-RTP-010.cisco.com ([64.101.220.150]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Sun, 9
Apr 2017 15:52:41 -0400
From: "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
CC: "draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org"
<draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org>, OSPF WG List
<ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR Call for "OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing" -
draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-12
Thread-Index: AQHSsWrZ5/eg++iIeE+aBxjjKMN4fA==
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 19:52:41 +0000
Message-ID: <F7BE534B-6AB3-44B5-944D-01018A0C840E@cisco.com>
References: <D50A64AF.A77BB%acee@cisco.com>
<31A510E1-7BA3-4CB8-9105-F934D156315D@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <31A510E1-7BA3-4CB8-9105-F934D156315D@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.162.249]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <CEFC0D0729449B45B391FE30E9A138E6@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/gcIoBf1qnFFnSrWdH43KhYlJe2Q>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] IPR Call for "OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing" -
draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-12
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>,
<mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>,
<mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:52:45 -0000
I’m not aware of any IPR that hasn’t been disclosed already. s. > On Apr 5, 2017, at 5:18 PM, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Acee, > > Not aware of any undisclosed IPR. > Thanks! > > Cheers, > Jeff > > > From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> > Date: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 06:09 > To: "draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org> > Cc: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org> > Subject: IPR Call for "OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing" - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-12 > Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org> > Resent-To: <ppsenak@cisco.com>om>, <sprevidi@cisco.com>om>, Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com>om>, <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>om>, <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>om>, <hannes@rtbrick.com>om>, <robjs@google.com> > Resent-Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 06:09:12 -0700 (PDT) > > Authors, > > In preparation for OSPF WG last call, we are polling again as to whether you have knowledge of any undeclared IPR. > > The following IPR declarations have been made for this draft: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions > > Please confirm to the best of your knowledge that the declared IPR is the only IPR pertaining to this draft. > > Thanks, > Acee >
- Re: [OSPF] IPR Call for "OSPF Extensions for Segm… Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
- [OSPF] IPR Call for "OSPF Extensions for Segment … Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] IPR Call for "OSPF Extensions for Segm… Peter Psenak
- Re: [OSPF] IPR Call for "OSPF Extensions for Segm… Rob Shakir
- Re: [OSPF] IPR Call for "OSPF Extensions for Segm… Jeff Tantsura