Re: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-update-03
Acee Lindem <acee@CISCO.COM> Thu, 16 June 2005 15:05 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA29335 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:05:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <16.0108006C@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:05:13 -0400
Received: by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.3) with spool id 75620579 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:05:11 -0400
Received: from 64.102.122.149 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0l) with TCP; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:05:11 -0400
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (64.102.124.13) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Jun 2005 11:05:12 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j5GF4Oi5010422 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:04:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:04:13 -0400
Received: from [10.82.241.104] ([10.82.241.104]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:04:14 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20050616134936.18145.qmail@mailweb33.rediffmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jun 2005 15:04:14.0071 (UTC) FILETIME=[A8A74070:01C57284]
Message-ID: <42B194EB.2060809@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:04:11 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Acee Lindem <acee@CISCO.COM>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-update-03
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <20050616134936.18145.qmail@mailweb33.rediffmail.com>
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Vivek Dubey wrote: >Hi Acee, >In continuation: > >2) Section 3.9 Multiple Interfaces to a single link >All of the multiple interfaces to the link will however appear in the router-LSA > > Section 3.4.3.1 Router-LSAs >Nor are interfaces without any full adjacencies described. > ><vivek> Agreed it would be more clear if exception in Section 3.4.3.1 is mentioned. Further, issue is, how should they be represented in the Router-LSA. I think repeating each NBR(of active interface on link) in standy interface description is redundant, though it preserves the current Router-LSA format. > > Hi Vivek, Offhand, I can't think of a better encoding and doubt any other encoding would be backward compatible. Thanks, Acee > >Thanks >Vivek > > > > >
- draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-update-03 Vivek Dubey
- Re: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-update-03 Acee Lindem
- Re: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-update-03 Vivek Dubey
- Re: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-update-03 Acee Lindem