Re: Incremental update of Fletcher's checksum
Fred Baker <fred@CISCO.COM> Mon, 15 September 2003 16:30 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA10512 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:30:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <16.00B8ED43@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:30:29 -0400
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 55085695 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:04:04 -0400
Received: from 171.71.176.70 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:04:02 -0400
Received: from mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com [171.71.163.14]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h8FG40Xq027165 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 09:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CSCOAMERA19540.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com [10.32.244.221]) by mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR) with SMTP id ALO29629; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender: fred@mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22
References: <LISTSERV%2003091311061035@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID: <6.0.0.22.2.20030915080011.04255368@mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 09:03:48 -0700
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Fred Baker <fred@CISCO.COM>
Subject: Re: Incremental update of Fletcher's checksum
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <LISTSERV%2003091311061035@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Precedence: list
At 08:06 AM 9/13/2003, Igor Miroshnik wrote: >1) May the Fletcher's checksum be updated incrementally? Yes. ISO DIS 8473 (CLNS) actually requires that to be done, and specifies in Annex C how to go about it. Of course, the copy of DIS 8473 I have doesn't actually have such a section, although it refers to it...
- Incremental update of Fletcher's checksum Igor Miroshnik
- Re: Incremental update of Fletcher's checksum Fred Baker