[OSPF] Comments on draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-00

["Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <[e-mail]>]

I have some comments in this draft.

Introduction
----------------
I think the last sentence should be removed. It is providing an example of a use case - and as such is more appropriate for Section 5. 

Also, node-tags are a property of the node - not of the routing protocol used to advertise them - I would like to see this point explicitly stated. Perhaps something like:

"Per-node administrative tags are used to advertise an attribute of the node. As such they are independent of the routing protocol used to advertise them. "


Section 2
---------------

This section seems redundant w Section 1. It should be removed.

Section 3 - Last Paragraph
----------------------------------
What is the reason for restricting the # of tags in a single TLV to 64? As OSPF TLVs have a 16 bit length field this restriction seems arbitrary.

Figure 1
-----------
The format of the ASCII art above needs to be corrected to properly indicate the field lengths.

Section 5
-------------

I would like to see this section moved to an Appendix. Since this section is not normative that would more clearly separate the normative/non-normative parts.

   Les