Re: [OSPF] [spring] draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-05
Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Mon, 02 February 2015 16:52 UTC
Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A711A1AFB; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:52:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t0555i1CK30M; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:52:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADAB31A03A2; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:52:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4195; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1422895965; x=1424105565; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Waccd02ug5DbuwFppkDFI/kcI4qstmEILFHFJzBsNBk=; b=fo2lz9cWyN6CEvl5ZSh+ehVvFMMIMZJA4wYbhGkawrjvpecWw+WMQujP d1i2O36NfDg2OZmLsebFG+JaTp2Q7IqOVVmUEhqieawjUeYWkzCQrVdtr 6j/uLUOSY38zZmRHFFHa2DWeRhpP1HegsieQVJnl68iTwElagZVz+Cg0T 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DoBAA2qs9U/xbLJq1bg1hZgwHBXQqFcQKBYQEBAQEBfYQNAQEEAQEBIA8BBTYKEQsYAgIFFgsCAgkDAgECARUwBgEMBgIBAYgpDcBIlWoBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEWBIEhjl6CaIFBAQSFS5Jjhj2MHyKCAhyBUT0xgkIBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,507,1418083200"; d="scan'208";a="335998441"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2015 16:52:42 +0000
Received: from [10.148.128.133] ([10.148.128.133]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t12GqfaM007253; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:52:42 GMT
Message-ID: <54CFAB4F.9060306@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 17:52:31 +0100
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)" <anil.sn@huawei.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
References: <327562D94EA7BF428CD805F338C31EF02B70A76D@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <327562D94EA7BF428CD805F338C31EF02B70A76D@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/hZZpT-5MHEA_YAkAMVkPtth2FwM>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] [spring] draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-05
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:52:47 -0000
Anil, Adj-SID is a link attribute. Link is identified the same way as it is identified in the Router LSA - link-type, link-id, link-data. for unnumbered link: link-type = 1 link-id = Neighboring router's Router ID link-data = interface's ifIndex So if RTA wants to use a particular link between RTB and RTC, it needs to know the ifIndex of that link and pick the link based on that. regards, Peter On 2/2/15 15:39 , Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL) wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a question on Adjacency Segment Identifier: > > How will RTA indentify and map adj-labels originated by RTB (having > unnumbered point-to-point connections b/w RTB and RTC) among labels to > which link ? > > Router ID > > 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 3.3.3.3 > > +-------+ P2p Links 1-5 +-------+ > > | +-------------+----+ | > > | | | | > > +-------+ | +------------------+ | > > | | | | | | > > | RTA +----------+ RTB +------------------+ RTC | > > | | | | | | > > +-------+ | +------------------+ | > > | | | | > > | +------------------+ | > > | | | | > > +-------+ +-------+ > > Router vertex 2.2.2.2 > > LinkType LinkId LinkData Metric IfIndex IfType > > P2P 1.1.1.1 11.0.0.112 100 0 NULL > >> Connected to Nbr vertex 1.1.1.1 > > P2P 3.3.3.3 12.0.0.112 100 0 NULL > >> Connected to Nbr vertex 3.3.3.3 > > P2P 3.3.3.3 13.0.0.112 100 0 NULL > >> Connected to Nbr vertex 3.3.3.3 > > P2P 3.3.3.3 14.0.0.112 100 0 NULL > >> Connected to Nbr vertex 3.3.3.3 > > P2P 3.3.3.3 15.0.0.112 100 0 NULL > >> Connected to Nbr vertex 3.3.3.3 > > P2P 3.3.3.3 16.0.0.112 100 0 NULL > >> Connected to Nbr vertex 3.3.3.3 > > Quick Reference RFC 2328 A.4.2 Router-LSAs [Link Type] > > Type > A quick description of the router link. One of the following. > Note that host routes are classified as links to stub networks > with network mask of 0xffffffff. > > Type Description > __________________________________________________ > 1 Point-to-point connection to another router > 2 Connection to a transit network > 3 Connection to a stub network > 4 Virtual link > > Link ID > Identifies the object that this router link connects to. Value > depends on the link's Type. When connecting to an object that > also originates an LSA (i.e., another router or a transit > network) the Link ID is equal to the neighboring LSA's Link > State ID. This provides the key for looking up the neighboring > LSA in the link state database during the routing table > calculation. See Section 12.2 <#Title_12.2>for more details. > > Type Link ID > ______________________________________ > 1 Neighboring router's Router ID > 2 IP address of Designated Router > 3 IP network/subnet number > 4 Neighboring router's Router ID > > > Link Data > Value again depends on the link's Type field. For connections to > stub networks, Link Data specifies the network's IP address > mask. For unnumbered point-to-point connections, it specifies > the interface's MIB-II [Ref8] <#BibRef_Ref8>ifIndex value. For the other > link > types it specifies the router interface's IP address. This > latter piece of information is needed during the routing table > build process, when calculating the IP address of the next hop. > See Section 16.1.1 <#Title_16.1.1>for more details. > > With Regards > > Anil S N > > > > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >
- [OSPF] [spring] draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing… Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)
- Re: [OSPF] [spring] draft-psenak-ospf-segment-rou… Peter Psenak
- [OSPF] draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-extensio… Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)
- Re: [OSPF] draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-exte… Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)
- Re: [OSPF] draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-exte… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-exte… Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)