Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3734)

I don't think it was an editorial error, it is technical error,

AB

On 9/24/13, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2328,
> "OSPF Version 2".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2328&eid=3734
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Ramakrishna DTV <ramakrishnadtv@infosys.com>
>
> Section: 8.2
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>             The AuType specified in the packet must match the AuType
>             specified for the associated area.
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>             The AuType specified in the packet must match the AuType
>             specified for the associated interface.
>
>
> Notes
> -----
> In OSPFv2, authentication is configured per interface and not per area.
>     Appendix D clarifies this: "The authentication type is configurable on a
> per-interface
>     (or equivalently, on a per-network/subnet) basis."
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC2328 (no draft string recorded)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : OSPF Version 2
> Publication Date    : April 1998
> Author(s)           : J. Moy
> Category            : INTERNET STANDARD
> Source              : Open Shortest Path First IGP
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>