Re: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-update-03

Vivek Dubey <vivek_ospf@REDIFFMAIL.COM> Thu, 16 June 2005 13:50 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA21589 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 09:50:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <22.0107FE4B@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 9:50:13 -0400
Received: by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.3) with spool id 75613197 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 09:48:05 -0400
Received: from 203.199.83.245 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0l) with TCP; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 09:48:03 -0400
Received: (qmail 18146 invoked by uid 510); 16 Jun 2005 13:49:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (203.126.136.223) by rediffmail.com via HTTP; 16 jun 2005 13:49:36 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Next_1118929776---0-203.199.83.245-18142"
Message-ID: <20050616134936.18145.qmail@mailweb33.rediffmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:49:36 -0000
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Vivek Dubey <vivek_ospf@REDIFFMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-update-03
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list

Hi Acee,
In continuation:

2) Section 3.9 Multiple Interfaces to a single link
All of the multiple interfaces to the link will however appear in the router-LSA

   Section 3.4.3.1  Router-LSAs
Nor are interfaces without any full adjacencies described.

<vivek> Agreed it would be more clear if exception in Section 3.4.3.1 is mentioned. Further, issue is, how should they be represented in the Router-LSA. I think repeating each NBR(of active interface on link) in standy interface description is redundant, though it preserves the current Router-LSA format. 


Thanks
Vivek