[OSPF] Re: [Isis-wg] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt]
JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com> Wed, 18 October 2006 11:58 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GaA4R-0003Sy-Ny; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:58:51 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GaA4Q-0003Se-Bj; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:58:50 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GaA4O-0000Yf-Vo; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:58:50 -0400
Received: from sj-dkim-7.cisco.com ([171.68.10.88]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2006 04:58:48 -0700
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (sj-core-3.cisco.com [171.68.223.137]) by sj-dkim-7.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k9IBwl2W012877; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 04:58:47 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k9IBwhbF027672; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 04:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 04:58:43 -0700
Received: from [172.16.6.19] ([10.21.144.251]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 04:58:42 -0700
In-Reply-To: <452C0A97.5010501@cisco.com>
References: <C12AE018.896F0%dward@cisco.com> <452C089D.5090204@cisco.com> <452C0A97.5010501@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <614CB204-756D-4FF4-8B70-453755EEC8B0@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:58:42 -0400
To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Oct 2006 11:58:42.0809 (UTC) FILETIME=[C1E73690:01C6F2AC]
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=2717; t=1161172727; x=1162036727; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim7002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jvasseur@cisco.com; z=From:JP=20Vasseur=20<jvasseur@cisco.com> |Subject:Re=3A=20[Isis-wg]=20Re=3A=20[Fwd=3A=20[mpls]=20WG=20Last=20Call=20on=20d raft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt]; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3D3K9s1Dqh68mGdh5nghD5CSU9Fy8=3D; b=RPsJjrqbGVC+UPwGU4gcT9IV7eOmWmJhKFJNmHy7GFed7jGh5/kdKv+2kY0CE6qyd77gVWoF EcBAB/80gcwy8o/IzJx9+LPf9MM1pH12IKCX2gGpqR+LDErw2DyGcICs;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-7.cisco.com; header.From=jvasseur@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 5011df3e2a27abcc044eaa15befcaa87
Cc: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>, rtg-dir@ietf.org, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>, isis-wg@ietf.org, ospf@ietf.org
Subject: [OSPF] Re: [Isis-wg] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt]
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Acee, On Oct 10, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: > JP, > > One more comment - Please write the document so that it can > apply to OSPFv3 TE as well. The existing draft can be an informative > reference (draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-traffic-07.txt) > Will do. Thanks. JP. > Thanks, > Acee > > Acee Lindem wrote: >> I've reviewed the subject document and don't have any comments on it >> from the perspective of the OSPF WG. However, I have the following >> comments as a member of the routing directorate (copying JP): >> >> 1. Why the cryptic sub-TLV name? RFC 3630 doesn't define short >> cryptic names for sub-TLVs so I don't really see why you've >> defined >> NB-0-BW-LSP? Why not just call it the Unconstrained LSP >> Count sub-TLV? >> Or at least come up with a better short name :^), e.g. BW-0- >> LSP-CNT. >> 2. How did you arrive at 19 for the suggested value for the sub- >> TLV type? I checked >> IANA and 18 is the next available. I may be missing a >> document though. >> 3. Do you want to reserve a value (e.g., 0xffffffff) to >> indicate no unconstrained >> LSPs are to traverse a given link. >> 4. Nit - in section 4, replace "OSPF LSA" with "OSPF LSAs" and >> "ISIS LSP" >> with "ISIS LSPs". >> >> Thanks, >> Acee >> David Ward wrote: >>> Do you want our WG to review? Co-Last Call (as we have for other >>> WG that >>> affect our protocol)? Do you have a desired date for end of last >>> call from >>> the IGPs? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> -DWard >>> >>> >>> On 9/4/06 5:01 AM, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.se> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> All, >>>> >>>> the MPLS working group want to notify the ospf and is-s >>>> working groups, as well as the routing directorate that >>>> we are currently doing a wg last call on >>>> draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt. >>>> >>>> Loa and George >>>> >>>> >>>> -------- Original Message -------- >>>> Subject: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te- >>>> lsps-02.txt >>>> Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:08:10 +0200 >>>> From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se> >>>> Organization: Acreo AB >>>> To: mpls@ietf.org >>>> >>>> Working Group, >>>> >>>> this initiates a two week working group last call on >>>> draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt >>>> >>>> The wg last call ends on September 17. >>>> >>>> Please send comments to the working group mailing list and/or >>>> the working group chairs. >>>> >>>> /Loa and George >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Isis-wg mailing list > Isis-wg@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
- [OSPF] [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-mp… Acee Lindem
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… Acee Lindem
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… Acee Lindem
- [OSPF] Re: [Isis-wg] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Cal… JP Vasseur
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… JP Vasseur
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… Acee Lindem
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… JP Vasseur
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… Acee Lindem
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… JP Vasseur
- Re: [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft… JP Vasseur
- Re: [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft… JP Vasseur