Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notification for draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag-00.txt
Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com> Mon, 21 October 2013 19:23 UTC
Return-Path: <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4778C11E8237 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:23:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7HzvgGm9hYA8 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (usevmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEE011E8600 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:23:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c618062d-b7fda8e0000024c6-32-52657f13dcae
Received: from EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.93]) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id AF.AB.09414.31F75625; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:23:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB101.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.118]) by EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.93]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:22:59 -0400
From: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
To: Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notification for draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOzpG2MZ1Oa1oSk0Wln+nocpUZIJn/y84A
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:22:58 +0000
Message-ID: <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE47030A1B71@eusaamb101.ericsson.se>
References: <20131021105352.29409.44644.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0cda3481d5ba41afaf0c61a5bc434b40@BY2PR05MB127.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE470309FF23@eusaamb101.ericsson.se> <75E8F047-BCC2-44AA-8EAC-B9C70226A308@juniper.net> <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE47030A00A0@eusaamb101.ericsson.se> <20131021135153.GA7872@juniper.net> <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE47030A027F@eusaamb101.ericsson.se> <20131021150847.GA7980@juniper.net> <A3679221-7FFC-4CE2-81C1-4E391619AC93@lindem.com> <a7c6d5f6d71843749315fec9fd204282@BY2PR05MB127.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <a7c6d5f6d71843749315fec9fd204282@BY2PR05MB127.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.134]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <326CB04C23B73A4DB961EC0E973F2254@ericsson.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmplkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZXLonVlekPjXI4E+roMW0W9PZLPrvPWGz aL60md2i5d49dos979YyWtx4tJfZgc2j7ctkJo8lS34yeVxvusru8WHRBdYAligum5TUnMyy 1CJ9uwSujL9T0wsmu1RMODmfqYHxr0EXIyeHhICJxOmuyewQtpjEhXvr2boYuTiEBI4ySrw9 /4IRwlnOKDGtdRIbSBWbgI7E80f/mEFsEQFNiWsTn7KCFDELbGKU6NnXwwSSEBbIlNi7axcL RFGWxJW9kxghbCOJl78XgNWwCKhKfP3QCWbzCvhKnJh1hhli2y0WiZtfVoFt4BQIk3i48BTY Zkag+76fWgPWwCwgLnHryXwmiLsFJJbsOc8MYYtKvHz8jxXCVpZY8mQ/C0S9jsSC3Z/YIGxr iYZHVxghbG2JZQtfM0McIShxcuYTlgmM4rOQrJiFpH0WkvZZSNpnIWlfwMi6ipGjtDi1LDfd yGATIzAqj0mw6e5g3PPS8hCjNAeLkjjvl7fOQUIC6YklqdmpqQWpRfFFpTmpxYcYmTg4pRoY W6acsZj5J2z92aPCvxa6X6+pOrxDyu+hy8zNN8rmitzZ/Yhv2+HL39Z/25rAfT2f3VtH/8zx c/Iy9SedGu9febYhyT1GoqgvUZqBT2v3K5GWrF4pjilhT0TKZ3IxuzrdZMopVD6WuuZKx3aJ MxN7LS57PCpwrm9NXcymkf3rheum3h/9q+6mKrEUZyQaajEXFScCAIF4WLiYAgAA
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>, Rob Shakir <rob.shakir@bt.com>, Harish Raghuveer <hraghuveer@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notification for draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:23:11 -0000
On Oct 21, 2013, at 3:12 PM, Shraddha Hegde wrote: > <Acee> Actually, I think separate LSAs is a better alternative. > > <Shraddha> Node-tag is a just another property of the node. OSPFv2/v3 have achieved the desired functionality using numerous link/node properties using TLVs in TE-LSA so > I don't see an absolute necessity of going with a new LSA. Shraddha - If you think the Router-Information LSA is the same as the TE LSA you have not read RFC 4970. Acee > > Rgds > Shraddha > > -----Original Message----- > From: ospf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 8:55 PM > To: Hannes Gredler > Cc: OSPF List; Rob Shakir; Harish Raghuveer > Subject: Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notification for draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag-00.txt > > > On Oct 21, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Hannes Gredler wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:10:04PM +0000, Acee Lindem wrote: >> | >> | On Oct 21, 2013, at 9:51 AM, Hannes Gredler wrote: >> | >> | On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 01:32:54PM +0000, Acee Lindem wrote: >> | | Hannes, >> | | >> | | On Oct 21, 2013, at 9:26 AM, Hannes Gredler wrote: >> | | >> | | > acee, >> | | > >> | | > why should we give an upper boundary on things which >> | | > - might be subject to change and >> | | > - which have a historic track record of being underestimated. >> | | >> | | You don't have to - just request a separate OSPFv2 opaque LSA and >> | IPv6 OSPFv3 LSA from IANA. >> | | Another alternative would be to extend the RI LSA to be multi- >> | instance and relegate the variable length tags to an instance other >> | than instance 0. >> | >> | again the question why i do have to ? >> | i can perfectly fit in single-digit as well as a few dozens of colors >> | in a single RI LSA >> | - what is your concern - except that we may use inappropriate large >> | space for TE ? >> | any reasonable implementation SHOULD restrict the node color set, >> | such >> | that overwhelming the 64K of RI LSPs is not going to happen. >> | >> | We don't want a standard that leaves room for >> | "unreasonable" implementations ;^). I think the policy in >> | RFC 4970 is clear. Here is an >> | excerpt: >> >> oh boy - i wish i could let the non-sense disappear just with good >> standard docs ;-) - but i hear you - so all you're asking for is an >> upper boundary ? - is 128 low enough to not scare you and be compliant >> to the below paragraph. > > Actually, I think separate LSAs is a better alternative. > > > >> >> | 3. Router Information LSA Opaque Usage and Applicability >> | >> | The purpose of the Router Information (RI) LSA is to advertise >> | information relating to the aggregate OSPF router. Normally, this >> | should be confined to TLVs with a single value or very few values. >> | It is not meant to be a generic container to carry any and all >> | information. The intent is to both limit the size of the RI LSA to >> | the point where an OSPF router will always be able to contain the >> | TLVs in a single LSA and to keep the task of determining what has >> | changed between LSA instances reasonably simple. Hence, discretion >> | and sound engineering judgment will need to be applied when deciding >> | whether newly proposed TLV(s) in support of a new application are >> | advertised in the RI LSA or warrant the creation of an application >> | specific LSA. >> | >> | >> | Anyway, this hasn't even been presented or accepted as a WG document. >> >> which is not a reason why we should not discuss how to iron out the bumpy parts now. > > Right. > > Thanks, > Acee > > >> >> thanks ! >> >> /hannes >> >> | | > the 'per-link' admin-groups serve as a good example here: >> | | > initially conceived as "you won't ever need more than >> | 32" we have >> | | > now arrived at a variable length (unbounded) extension. >> | | > >> | | > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-osborne-mpls-extended-admin- >> | groups-00 >> | | > >> | | > for a humorous take to it, have a look at >> | | > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1925 >> | | > rule (9) and (10) >> | | > >> | | > /hannes >> | | > >> | | > On Oct 21, 2013, at 3:12 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: >> | | > >> | | >> Hi Shraddha, >> | | >> Since the size of the tag data is unbounded, could you either >> | put it in a separate OSPFv2 opaque LSA and OSPFv3 LSA or limit the >> | size to some maximum number of tags, e.g., 16? >> | | >> Thanks, >> | | >> Acee >> | | >> On Oct 21, 2013, at 7:05 AM, Shraddha Hegde wrote: >> | | >> >> | | >>> Hi All, >> | | >>> >> | | >>> We have posted a draft on " Advertising per-node >> | administrative tags in OSPF" and would like to hear your views >> | on it. Please feel free to raise any suggestion/comment on the >> | content. >> | | >>> >> | | >>> Rgds >> | | >>> Shraddha >> | | >>> >> | | >>> -----Original Message----- >> | | >>> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet- >> | drafts@ietf.org] >> | | >>> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 4:24 PM >> | | >>> To: Harish Raghuveer; Shraddha Hegde; British Telecom; Hannes >> | Gredler; Rob Shakir >> | | >>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-hegde-ospf-node- >> | admin-tag-00.txt >> | | >>> >> | | >>> >> | | >>> A new version of I-D, draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag-00.txt >> | | >>> has been successfully submitted by Shraddha Hegde and posted to >> | the IETF repository. >> | | >>> >> | | >>> Filename: draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag >> | | >>> Revision: 00 >> | | >>> Title: Advertising per-node administrative tags in OSPF >> | | >>> Creation date: 2013-10-21 >> | | >>> Group: Individual Submission >> | | >>> Number of pages: 6 >> | | >>> URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft- >> | hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag-00.txt >> | | >>> Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hegde- >> | ospf-node-admin-tag >> | | >>> Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hegde-ospf- >> | node-admin-tag-00 >> | | >>> >> | | >>> >> | | >>> Abstract: >> | | >>> This document describes an extension to OSPF protocol [RFC2328] >> | to >> | | >>> add an optional operational capability, that allows tagging and >> | | >>> grouping of the nodes in an OSPF domain. This allows >> | | >>> simplification,ease of management and control over route and >> | path >> | | >>> selection based on configured policies. >> | | >>> >> | | >>> This document describes the protocol extensions to disseminate >> | per- >> | | >>> node admin-tags to the OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 protocols. >> | | >>> >> | | >>> >> | | >>> >> | | >>> >> | | >>> >> | | >>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time >> | of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at >> | tools.ietf.org. >> | | >>> >> | | >>> The IETF Secretariat >> | | >>> >> | | >>> >> | | >>> >> | | >>> _______________________________________________ >> | | >>> OSPF mailing list >> | | >>> OSPF@ietf.org >> | | >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >> | | >> >> | | >> _______________________________________________ >> | | >> OSPF mailing list >> | | >> OSPF@ietf.org >> | | >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >> | | >> >> | | >> >> | | > >> | | > >> | | >> | | >> | | >> | >> | >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OSPF mailing list >> OSPF@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > > > > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
- [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notification f… Shraddha Hegde
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Hannes Gredler
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Hannes Gredler
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Hannes Gredler
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Shraddha Hegde
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Shraddha Hegde
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Anton Smirnov
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Hannes Gredler
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Anton Smirnov
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Hannes Gredler