IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-03

Anil Kumar <anil.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 22 September 2015 08:21 UTC

Return-Path: <anil.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0401A0383; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ff6IkAxonsrK; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F5871A0398; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicgb1 with SMTP id gb1so148227324wic.1; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=DETdF+F5B3wcXOJjltE3kdAMfsO/lwwQ/kCN4Q3i1dE=; b=MLoA5nBUljdG5Sr2K7fqrE7cuhRyDiZ6I4b2XodYkdn0Ys43Db0lkdHXGZiDcIAAgi NQd66cr79yDhOize6KoAUOBpLoBVGvm9or8rwdJRPg2IzcQ+8hkxvk6JJflcq+V3K14M 3fKM1LcWPL0DZJ8kH+ke6n65wKf86r4VDxxe9zF0KNspWfmzoqAUgi6b06HbswGhaPxG uN/kz1sBPVAxwwp3wRFf40xfI1C2MgQelQd3xV8oDCwOOQFaKqBRFdHZcPcjOllOtsk8 cwgawJR9EKijfOVRbjXrFJDnSTyog90a/QS/mKh6Zy5xeLJDHkmwkD7K5zvjT/33jE9W U2Xg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.58.177 with SMTP id s17mr32382238wjq.102.1442910076957; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.172.137 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.172.137 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <56010D68.4040807@cisco.com>
References: <327562D94EA7BF428CD805F338C31EF06C05F21E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <56010D68.4040807@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:51:16 +0530
Message-ID: <CAC38=VG+jWC6Hp+nS1Ew=zUd4F6JOh42kdjcS6vsyL-J1Cd-cQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anil Kumar <anil.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7ba9791a947bf4052051aeac
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/jLxNssMxeO3-vOrh0qASoexASSY>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions.all@ietf.org>, "cfilsfil@cisco.com" <cfilsfil@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>, "rob.shakir@bt.com" <rob.shakir@bt.com>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-03
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:21:24 -0000

Thanks peter I overlooked it :)

Thanks & Regards
Anil S N

" Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send" - Jon
postel
On Sep 22, 2015 1:42 PM, "Peter Psenak" <ppsenak@cisco.com> wrote:

> Anil,
>
> there is no support for multi topology in existing OSPFv3 specification.
> We can not define it in the SR draft.
>
> thanks,
> Peter
>
> On 9/22/15 10:02 , Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL) wrote:
>
>> Hi Authors,
>>
>> In OSPFv3 Extensions for Segment Routing I couldn’t find any references
>> to MT-ID considered for Node, Prefix & Adjacency SID advertisement in
>> contrast to OSPFv2 and ISIS SR extensions.
>>
>> Please let me know you opinion on the same.
>>
>> Thanks & Regards
>>
>> Anil S N
>>
>> “Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send” - Jon
>> Postel
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>

v2.2.1 | Report a Bug | By Email