Re: [OSPF] Security Extension for OSPFv2 when using Manual Key Management - draft-bhatia-karp-ospf-ip-layer-protection-03

Stan Ratliff <sratliff@cisco.com> Mon, 11 April 2011 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <sratliff@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6623A6A49 for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6PCbQU9J6l4H for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233D33A6988 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=sratliff@cisco.com; l=446; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1302545808; x=1303755408; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date: references; bh=SfoC16sBsrrhwrBkI01hrD2/7z6gKgbYgTlci0weBIo=; b=b4KrfjNO5hPL1/8ArFyDOnGBAyQWZTUSX3K1lkt5+soOpB/5DYanJEf1 6iUzv8w6TSbYqGi0OIly5dqlncuMuNo1yv4ynr2AOzddTq/knsZC6EznR CVt4tRKg8Ku/WfCntAsiI5dBvH/3kuDVUcftmyLqht8LqmBjSmDmlQ6V3 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAFlEo02tJXG9/2dsb2JhbACmH3eIep4unC2FbgSNWA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,192,1301875200"; d="scan'208";a="293885113"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2011 18:16:48 +0000
Received: from dhcp-64-102-54-197.cisco.com (dhcp-64-102-54-197.cisco.com [64.102.54.197]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3BIFeWm013785; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:16:48 GMT
Message-Id: <A0EFB0C7-94CC-4B7D-833A-D6BB6730B52A@cisco.com>
From: Stan Ratliff <sratliff@cisco.com>
To: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B460FD5-4E9D-4ECF-8D7B-24137FBF9017@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:16:48 -0400
References: <4B460FD5-4E9D-4ECF-8D7B-24137FBF9017@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Security Extension for OSPFv2 when using Manual Key Management - draft-bhatia-karp-ospf-ip-layer-protection-03
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:16:48 -0000

Support.

Regards,
Stan


On Apr 11, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:

> There was general agreement that this should be a WG document at the  
> meeting in Prague. Please indicate your position on making this  
> draft a WG document with intended status Proposed Standard.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf