Re: Data Description Exchange
Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM> Fri, 30 August 2002 14:54 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA20001 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:54:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <4.006F6C29@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:55:47 -0400
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 118174 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:55:47 -0400
Received: from 155.53.12.9 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:55:47 -0400
Received: from redback.com (login005.redback.com [155.53.12.60]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01892CDB41 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 07:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020508 Netscape6/6.2.3
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0208301027110.2857-100000@ux10.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <3D6F8704.6080005@redback.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:53:56 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM>
Subject: Re: Data Description Exchange
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Keng wrote: >>--- Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM> wrote: >> >>>Also, during exStart->exChange->Full transition, >>>is it possible to form an >>> >>>>adjacency without sending LSA Header info in its >>>> >>>DD packets. >>> >>> >> No. You'd always have at least your router LSA. >> > > Acee, > > with regards to your comment above, > if a master router has more DD packets to send than the slave and the > slave has already sent its entire db, doesn't the slave just ack with DD > packets that have no lsa headers (I=0, M=0)? Hi Keng, You are correct. I was speaking in terms of the database exchange process and the first DD packet sent in the exchange. > > thanks, > Keng. > > -- Acee
- Data Description Exchange Shreayas Becker
- Re: Data Description Exchange Acee Lindem
- Re: Data Description Exchange Shreyas
- Re: Data Description Exchange Acee Lindem
- Re: Data Description Exchange Keng
- Re: Data Description Exchange Acee Lindem