Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3644)
Preet DSouza <preet.desouza17@gmail.com> Fri, 07 June 2013 20:49 UTC
Return-Path: <preet.desouza17@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3D521F99A7 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.397, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MANGLED_NAIL=2.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bPPQ91gCRjBS for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x229.google.com (mail-qa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88ADF21F99A1 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id f14so1192132qak.14 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Hf4Jfmbc9fVa6YvCq+VmHSmVdGxKGY1YqJ64RzO2BRs=; b=RyaIKhiYzQC8uOLdfygzjE3MebzpBKNYcUIRf7kPRXTO8aSQUYQbWk1zfnoxMmPSzd S/XCsgaqRSA7t28iFciLaibinnjTwHxbK9aTYy+biOfFNF6Kjqj/v2+tCIzJshhPw2UX vMNt+1wfvs9bD0szbGb1ozuOVqgjV8nppoqxlIZAlxc+TXrD/oiwVU8JtEEWxWshGGJp kUs+vGT6idd2/LGa0JOoinJD1p9rufdjYyuic9cudBFgZn4lRSU6tO2XjT5ovBPWL7bj kfpJ2g4IFah9k0wLMIuGoMyZu6SQye0lMdjGom4jFtkkP6NbT6i9Kh5+lfWWpbJBkYUp Qg8w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.24.198 with SMTP id w6mr437581qef.58.1370638186904; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.74.2 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFip=q53EJnuCDRr_TVgug1c=gS9fAXqAiVg95qoG+mXsA5=eQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20130607194649.DFE7B62114@rfc-editor.org> <D05F4D3D-528F-4E6B-86AB-914A0CA8AE99@lindem.com> <CAFip=q7aXGkROUSFCBqU+ZtOF8PU6eZpBSy-E2PS34uTFHnOSg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFip=q5TjVzC7qO_sdJCCjXG-Vh+gMB4wGayH4XkY8vfuEuPEQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFip=q53EJnuCDRr_TVgug1c=gS9fAXqAiVg95qoG+mXsA5=eQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 02:19:46 +0530
Message-ID: <CAFip=q4bkitAU9EqxbLvhO7cYCO_mOJGYxq+0AvMyP4Lcur3Nw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Preet DSouza <preet.desouza17@gmail.com>
To: Acee Lindem <acee@lindem.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b5d8e793f056c04de969285"
Cc: jmoy@casc.com, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3644)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 20:49:49 -0000
Please refer to RFC errata ID 3645 for the corrected report which has been submitted. On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Preet DSouza <preet.desouza17@gmail.com>wrote: > Kindly note that I've made a minor mistake in the RFC errata notes. > > It says, > > Notes: > > section 2.1.2 > > Page 20, Figure 2 : A sample Autonomous System. > > The interfaces Ia and Ib have not been added to the directed graph. > By definition of point-to-point links under OSPF, for serial interfaces > defined by IP addresses, > router RT6 should advertise a stub network to Ib whereas router RT6 should > advertise a stub network to Ia . > > > It should say, > > Notes: > > section 2.1.2 > > Page 20, Figure 2 : A sample Autonomous System. > > The interfaces Ia and Ib have not been added to the directed graph. > By definition of point-to-point links under OSPF, for serial interfaces > defined by IP addresses, > router RT6 should advertise a stub network to Ib whereas router *RT10*should advertise a stub network to Ia . > > > > > On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Preet DSouza <preet.desouza17@gmail.com>wrote: > >> The corrected text should be as under. >> The additions are noted in bold. >> >> **FROM** >> >> |RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT| >> |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10|11|12|N3|N6|N8|N9| >> ----- --------------------------------------------- >> RT1| | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | | >> RT2| | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | | >> RT3| | | | | |6 | | | | | | |0 | | | | >> RT4| | | | |8 | | | | | | | |0 | | | | >> RT5| | | |8 | |6 |6 | | | | | | | | | | >> RT6| | |8 | |7 | | | | |5 | | | | | | | >> RT7| | | | |6 | | | | | | | | |0 | | | >> * RT8| | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | >> * RT9| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | >> T RT10| | | | | |7 | | | | | | | |0 |0 | | >> O RT11| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 |0 | >> * RT12| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | >> * N1|3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | >> N2| |3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | >> N3|1 |1 |1 |1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | >> N4| | |2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | >> N6| | | | | | |1 |1 | |1 | | | | | | | >> N7| | | | | | | |4 | | | | | | | | | >> N8| | | | | | | | | |3 |2 | | | | | | >> N9| | | | | | | | |1 | |1 |1 | | | | | >> N10| | | | | | | | | | | |2 | | | | | >> N11| | | | | | | | |3 | | | | | | | | >> N12| | | | |8 | |2 | | | | | | | | | | >> N13| | | | |8 | | | | | | | | | | | | >> N14| | | | |8 | | | | | | | | | | | | >> N15| | | | | | |9 | | | | | | | | | | >> H1| | | | | | | | | | | |10| | | | | >> *Ia| | | | | | | | | |5 | | | | | | |** >> Ib| | | | | |7 | | | | | | | | | | |* >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Preet DSouza <preet.desouza17@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hello Acee, >>> >>> I made two additions. >>> The last two rows in the **To** column have been added. >>> They are interfaces Ia and Ib which are represented as stub networks >>> owing to their definition on a point-to-point link between RT6 and RT10 >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Acee Lindem <acee@lindem.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Preet - Can you denote which boxes you changed and why? In its current >>>> state, this errata should be summarily rejected. >>>> Thanks, >>>> Acee >>>> On Jun 7, 2013, at 3:46 PM, RFC Errata System wrote: >>>> >>>> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2328, >>>> > "OSPF Version 2". >>>> > >>>> > -------------------------------------- >>>> > You may review the report below and at: >>>> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2328&eid=3644 >>>> > >>>> > -------------------------------------- >>>> > Type: Technical >>>> > Reported by: Preet D'Souza <preet.desouza17@gmail.com> >>>> > >>>> > Section: 2.1.2 >>>> > >>>> > Original Text >>>> > ------------- >>>> > **FROM** >>>> > >>>> > |RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT| >>>> > |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10|11|12|N3|N6|N8|N9| >>>> > ----- --------------------------------------------- >>>> > RT1| | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | | >>>> > RT2| | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | | >>>> > RT3| | | | | |6 | | | | | | |0 | | | | >>>> > RT4| | | | |8 | | | | | | | |0 | | | | >>>> > RT5| | | |8 | |6 |6 | | | | | | | | | | >>>> > RT6| | |8 | |7 | | | | |5 | | | | | | | >>>> > RT7| | | | |6 | | | | | | | | |0 | | | >>>> > * RT8| | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | >>>> > * RT9| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | >>>> > T RT10| | | | | |7 | | | | | | | |0 |0 | | >>>> > O RT11| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 |0 | >>>> > * RT12| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | >>>> > * N1|3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | >>>> > N2| |3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | >>>> > N3|1 |1 |1 |1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | >>>> > N4| | |2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | >>>> > N6| | | | | | |1 |1 | |1 | | | | | | | >>>> > N7| | | | | | | |4 | | | | | | | | | >>>> > N8| | | | | | | | | |3 |2 | | | | | | >>>> > N9| | | | | | | | |1 | |1 |1 | | | | | >>>> > N10| | | | | | | | | | | |2 | | | | | >>>> > N11| | | | | | | | |3 | | | | | | | | >>>> > N12| | | | |8 | |2 | | | | | | | | | | >>>> > N13| | | | |8 | | | | | | | | | | | | >>>> > N14| | | | |8 | | | | | | | | | | | | >>>> > N15| | | | | | |9 | | | | | | | | | | >>>> > H1| | | | | | | | | | | |10| | | | | >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Corrected Text >>>> > -------------- >>>> > **FROM** >>>> > >>>> > |RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT| >>>> > |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10|11|12|N3|N6|N8|N9| >>>> > ----- --------------------------------------------- >>>> > RT1| | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | | >>>> > RT2| | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | | >>>> > RT3| | | | | |6 | | | | | | |0 | | | | >>>> > RT4| | | | |8 | | | | | | | |0 | | | | >>>> > RT5| | | |8 | |6 |6 | | | | | | | | | | >>>> > RT6| | |8 | |7 | | | | |5 | | | | | | | >>>> > RT7| | | | |6 | | | | | | | | |0 | | | >>>> > * RT8| | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | >>>> > * RT9| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | >>>> > T RT10| | | | | |7 | | | | | | | |0 |0 | | >>>> > O RT11| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 |0 | >>>> > * RT12| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | >>>> > * N1|3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | >>>> > N2| |3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | >>>> > N3|1 |1 |1 |1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | >>>> > N4| | |2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | >>>> > N6| | | | | | |1 |1 | |1 | | | | | | | >>>> > N7| | | | | | | |4 | | | | | | | | | >>>> > N8| | | | | | | | | |3 |2 | | | | | | >>>> > N9| | | | | | | | |1 | |1 |1 | | | | | >>>> > N10| | | | | | | | | | | |2 | | | | | >>>> > N11| | | | | | | | |3 | | | | | | | | >>>> > N12| | | | |8 | |2 | | | | | | | | | | >>>> > N13| | | | |8 | | | | | | | | | | | | >>>> > N14| | | | |8 | | | | | | | | | | | | >>>> > N15| | | | | | |9 | | | | | | | | | | >>>> > H1| | | | | | | | | | | |10| | | | | >>>> > Ia| | | | | | | | | |5 | | | | | | | >>>> > Ib| | | | | |7 | | | | | | | | | | | >>>> > >>>> > Notes >>>> > ----- >>>> > section 2.1.2 >>>> > >>>> > Page 20, Figure 2 : A sample Autonomous System. >>>> > >>>> > The interfaces Ia and Ib have not been added to the directed >>>> graph. >>>> > By definition of point-to-point links under OSPF, for serial >>>> interfaces defined by IP addresses, >>>> > router RT6 should advertise a stub network to Ib whereas router RT6 >>>> should advertise a stub network to Ia . >>>> > >>>> > Instructions: >>>> > ------------- >>>> > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >>>> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >>>> > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >>>> > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >>>> > >>>> > -------------------------------------- >>>> > RFC2328 (no draft string recorded) >>>> > -------------------------------------- >>>> > Title : OSPF Version 2 >>>> > Publication Date : April 1998 >>>> > Author(s) : J. Moy >>>> > Category : INTERNET STANDARD >>>> > Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP >>>> > Area : Routing >>>> > Stream : IETF >>>> > Verifying Party : IESG >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > OSPF mailing list >>>> > OSPF@ietf.org >>>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
- [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3644) RFC Errata System
- Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3… Preet DSouza
- Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3… Preet DSouza
- Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3… Preet DSouza
- Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3… Preet DSouza