Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-xu-ospf-routable-ip-address

"Nobo Akiya (nobo)" <nobo@cisco.com> Wed, 27 August 2014 23:39 UTC

Return-Path: <nobo@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DED11A02BB for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.168
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.168 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rlOk0vtEfEBv for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D4111A02A3 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7519; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1409182745; x=1410392345; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=WdfiqpDPNmLy422NP+jHhaW4nf3LJMRsEDe7MAYXG3U=; b=bRV66G7f68HAKethPrHodySTTPJRJyb/5E7+mSC3+JYNQbhyglwDyzaP t7R/E7j542j0q3vmaa9UnP9YLHFEo1+5pqTwVHigZWxsDxANOwfmVjvLJ SUZ+I+fvqXtU4B3nHZYws1rU9vEt8fmaVjlhcmrRUYzekfM2fqjOAX2lU c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiMFAKVr/lOtJA2F/2dsb2JhbABbgkcjI1NXBMwaAQmHTwGBFBZ3hAMBAQEEAQEBKkEbAgEIEQQBAQsdBycLFAkIAgQBEgiIOgEMv14TBI51Ji0KAYMvgR0FjxuCFKBDg15sgQdBgQcBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.04,414,1406592000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="72978457"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Aug 2014 23:39:05 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com [173.37.183.87]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7RNd3qG011890 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 23:39:03 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com ([fe80::747b:83e1:9755:d453]) by xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com ([173.37.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 18:39:03 -0500
From: "Nobo Akiya (nobo)" <nobo@cisco.com>
To: "Abhay Roy (akr)" <akr@cisco.com>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-xu-ospf-routable-ip-address
Thread-Index: AQHPwJf7kU/vLZ3UrkGtq9KR7hMf/JvlHhYg
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 23:39:01 +0000
Message-ID: <CECE764681BE964CBE1DFF78F3CDD3943A3BB912@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com>
References: <53FB8718.1090003@cisco.com> <53FB89B0.2040407@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <53FB89B0.2040407@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.243.66]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CECE764681BE964CBE1DFF78F3CDD3943A3BB912xmbalnx01ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/kkF2e_8zQol9xnYmGTVLYZV2njA
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-xu-ospf-routable-ip-address
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 23:39:09 -0000

I have read draft-xu-ospf-routable-ip-address and support its progress as an OSPF WG document.

Thanks!

-Nobo


From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Abhay Roy (akr)
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 3:09 PM
To: ospf@ietf.org
Subject: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-xu-ospf-routable-ip-address

This is a simple document with a few strong drivers (ELC and S-BFD) requiring it..

Please share your support or objections in making it a WG document.

Regards,
-Abhay
On 8/25/14, 11:57 AM, Abhay Roy wrote:
[speaking as WG member]

Two comments..

1. Section 3 has this text - "This TLV is only applicable to OSPFv2.".
    I believe, this should also be applicable to RFC5838, i.e. for IPv4 AF's

2. Section 3 and 4 describes the scope as SHOULD be domain-wide. I personally don't see any real use cause of any lessor scope (Area or Link) since we have mechanisms to generate routable IP address for those scopes already. So I would suggest we limit the scope of this document to be "MUST be domain-wide". Any concerns with that?

Regards,
-Abhay




_______________________________________________

OSPF mailing list

OSPF@ietf.org<mailto:OSPF@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf