Re: [OSPF] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig-13: (with COMMENT)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 05 February 2015 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8CD1A00C6; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 08:00:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ws1_FGjrCgIO; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 08:00:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F9E81A88DC; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 08:00:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1660; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1423152049; x=1424361649; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=9YYVCP/gc+6U7cs5HJ33W8aEVJIH525kHP171FwfySs=; b=TiFeLefZO/ROtmUgQUdFdNQHdc6Rd8/+Kb799FzQlOyW7w0aikvsBJgs O5fTje623MdBrLx+Y6OqgkNGkUskSTrZOQ/NkaAzxcrdAaX2vrfZhcMj7 c58oRDe+wYytAlkqH/84AnsinlPbzzwerEmFTaxzkf3sw7K3IQbMVcOu8 Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlAFAO+S01StJA2G/2dsb2JhbABagwZSWQTCSIVxAoElQwEBAQEBfYQNAQEEOj8QAgEINhAyJQIEAQ0FCYgkDdZtAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYjxYRAVACBYQpBYVOiUaDUIVagRc2gk2OUCKCMoE8bwGBCjl+AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,524,1418083200"; d="scan'208";a="394070344"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2015 16:00:48 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t15G0lKR008179 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:00:47 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.118]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 10:00:47 -0600
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig-13: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHQQVznATjfRTupI0es+uQNlMq0yA==
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 16:00:47 +0000
Message-ID: <D0F8FCFC.D758%acee@cisco.com>
References: <20150204213611.10254.47263.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150204213611.10254.47263.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <965FB46653AC414EBF1B63E0F4FB08F6@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/lYFq5gcvIa_nxLixCoUjpULpDLY>
Cc: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>, Ing-Wher Chen <ing-wher.chen@ericsson.com>, "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig.all@ietf.org>, "ospf-chairs@ietf.org" <ospf-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 16:00:52 -0000

Hi Alissa, 
Adrian had a similar comment and has suggested the following text:

OSPFv3 [OSPFV3] is a candidate for deployments in environments where
   auto-configuration is a requirement.  This document describes
   extensions to OSPFv3 to enable it to operate in these environments.
   In this mode of operation, the protocol is largely unchanged from the
   base OSPFv3 protocol specification [OSPFV3].


It will be in the next revision.

Thanks,
Acee

On 2/4/15, 4:36 PM, "Alissa Cooper" <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:

>Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
>draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig-13: No Objection
>
>When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
>The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig/
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>COMMENT:
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>= Section 1 =
>"OSPFv3 [OSPFV3] is a candidate for deployments in environments where
>   auto-configuration is a requirement.  Its operation is largely
>   unchanged from the base OSPFv3 protocol specification [OSPFV3]."
>
>The use of "its" here doesn't make a lot of sense -- a plain reading of
>this is that OSPFv3 is unchanged from OSPFv3.
>
>