[OSPF] RE: inconsistency in draft-ietf-ospf-mib-update-11.txt?

Lou,

It is inconsistent. Thanks for catching this.
I don't think there is a reason to make Opaque
LSA support configurable as it is a backwards
compatible extension to OSPF, so the verbiage
about persistence should be deleted.

Any objections?

-Dan 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 2:07 PM
> To: Joyal, Daniel (BL60:SF23); pgalecki@airvana.com; 
> spencer.giacalone@csfb.com
> Cc: ospf@ietf.org
> Subject: inconsistency in draft-ietf-ospf-mib-update-11.txt?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> So, the following is taken from your draft:
>     ospfOpaqueLsaSupport  OBJECT-TYPE
>           SYNTAX       TruthValue
>           MAX-ACCESS   read-only
>           STATUS       current
>           DESCRIPTION
>              "The router's support for Opaque LSA types.
> 
>               This object is persistent and when written
>               the entity SHOULD save the change to non-volatile
>               storage."
>           REFERENCE
>              "The OSPF Opaque LSA Option"
>           ::= { ospfGeneralGroup 16 }
> 
> The access and description seem inconsistent.  The 
> description implies that acess should be "read-write".  Am I 
> missing something?
> 
> Lou
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf