Re: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental (draft-chen-ospf-ttz-09.txt)
"Xu, Fengman" <fengman.xu@verizon.com> Fri, 16 January 2015 16:54 UTC
Return-Path: <fengman.xu@verizon.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25971AD071 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 08:54:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.711
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.711 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rtwKUEbN9rFk for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 08:54:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fldsmtpe02.verizon.com (fldsmtpe02.verizon.com [140.108.26.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E15F31AD06E for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 08:54:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verizon.com; i=fengman.xu@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1421427272; x=1452963272; h=from:to:date:subject:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=E8eJLPz1QkmkBD5mbzSE6+Yml467o92uJQcosSvT0rc=; b=UkaylAc8H5nTclatmEJHDb6wOPIAjYQZhSKHbnotdciPyT4b1r0Wxmmd SwkE3s9IvBB8CM0clJ9eWgSd5XlvKK+1Pd+Cm2nhlFx4YZhzpqVgHNsQ4 LB/NY4Ca+9qtcfT59FfxiqcJdyw/L3WyzZrGyZhwt3T1NBORHmUDcHOf0 Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false
Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi02.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.144]) by fldsmtpe02.verizon.com with ESMTP; 16 Jan 2015 16:54:31 +0000
From: "Xu, Fengman" <fengman.xu@verizon.com>
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,412,1418083200"; d="scan'208";a="915312959"
Received: from fhdp1lumxc7hb02.verizon.com (HELO FHDP1LUMXC7HB02.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.59.189]) by fldsmtpi02.verizon.com with ESMTP; 16 Jan 2015 16:54:31 +0000
Received: from FHDP1LUMXC7V33.us.one.verizon.com ([169.254.3.38]) by FHDP1LUMXC7HB02.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.59.189]) with mapi; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:54:31 -0500
To: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:54:30 -0500
Thread-Topic: OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental (draft-chen-ospf-ttz-09.txt)
Thread-Index: AdAxAkOA1BFJZhatRIqAQ7p1AVYosgAqsprg
Message-ID: <65017ED8D0F1E343AF27F9E2F24859F2170E12FCA3@FHDP1LUMXC7V33.us.one.verizon.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/mmqh297BgSpLGmj09Hdk0gIT2RQ>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental (draft-chen-ospf-ttz-09.txt)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:54:35 -0000
I support it as I think it could benefit for carrier network consolidation. Fengman -----Original Message----- From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2015 4:09 PM To: OSPF WG List Subject: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental We have discussed OSPF TTZ at several IETFs and the authors and their colleagues have even developed a working prototype. We believe there is consensus that the protocol mechanisms are viable. However, there is disagreement as to whether or not these mechanisms will provide significant benefit. The answer is definitely topology and deployment dependent. After some discussion, we have decided to poll for adoption as an experimental draft. Please indicate your support or opposition WG adoption as experimental prior to January 24th, 2015. For your convenience, here is a URL for the draft: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-chen-ospf-ttz-09.txt Thanks, Acee and Abhay _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf