Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag

Karsten Thomann <karsten_thomann@linfre.de> Thu, 28 August 2014 08:12 UTC

Return-Path: <karsten_thomann@linfre.de>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C9591A0722 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 01:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QTa4MEgL2SBW for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 01:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linfre.de (linfre.de [83.151.26.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 632B51A0AD5 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 01:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.43.66.140] (194.163.249.24) by linfreserv.linfre (Axigen) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 36A207; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:12:21 +0200
Message-ID: <53FEE464.7040200@linfre.de>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:12:20 +0200
From: Karsten Thomann <karsten_thomann@linfre.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ospf@ietf.org
References: <D0212051.2116%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D0212051.2116%acee@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050900040405070600030400"
X-AXIGEN-DK-Result: No records
DomainKey-Status: no signature
X-AxigenSpam-Level: 5
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/n6vmelL6s3jQ3uOMrMdcxPqF1xo
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 08:12:35 -0000

I support the adoption of the draft.

Am 25.08.2014 23:18, schrieb Acee Lindem (acee):
> There are situations where node level policy is required and an OSPF 
> advertised admin tag simplifies this. For example, advertisement of 
> remote-LFA eligibility.
>
> Please indicate your support or objections to adopting this draft as 
> an OSPF WG document.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf