Query..Pls help
Khan Amir-G20247 <amirkhan@MOTOROLA.COM> Mon, 25 July 2005 08:45 UTC
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dwyag-0002UG-Jw for ospf-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 04:45:38 -0400
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA28366 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 04:45:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <1.010B30C5@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 4:45:35 -0400
Received: by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.4) with spool id 80294999 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 04:45:07 -0400
Received: from 129.188.136.8 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0m) with TCP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 04:35:07 -0400
Received: from il06exr03.mot.com (il06exr03.mot.com [129.188.137.133]) by motgate8.mot.com (8.12.11/Motgate7) with ESMTP id j6P8iVVW010111 for <ospf@peach.ease.lsoft.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 01:44:35 -0700 (MST)
Received: from zin24exm01.ap.mot.com (zin24exm01.ap.mot.com [10.232.25.1]) by il06exr03.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j6P8fKUX019290 for <ospf@peach.ease.lsoft.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:41:21 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by zin24exm01.ap.mot.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <NTW6VY4G>; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:04:59 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C590F3.BE37567C"
Message-ID: <772BCEF88A1DD91191F80011856715F3047CB229@zin24exm01.ap.mot.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:04:59 +0530
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Khan Amir-G20247 <amirkhan@MOTOROLA.COM>
Subject: Query..Pls help
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Hi I'm having a query regarding OSPF MIB updates "draft-ietf-ospf-mib-update-08.txt". In the current draft a new OSPF Host Table object "ospfHostCfgAreaID" has been added this object is of read-create type and is a updation to "ospfHostAreaID" which is now read-only. I don't understand why was there a need to introduce a new object "ospfHostCfgAreaID" when "ospfHostAreaID" already exist ? "ospfHostAreaID" was initially read-create only, it could have made to serve the purpose as ospfHostCfgAreaID serves now, if it woud have been enhanced to support the feature to configure the new area if one doesn't exists. Besides this, we have to update the "ospfHostAreaID" object everytime with "ospfHostCfgAreaID" object whenever its been configured by the user, which is a good as updating "ospfHostAreaID" directly. Pls revert back with your comments at the earliest. Regards Aamir Khan Motorola India
- Query..Pls help Khan Amir-G20247
- Re: Query..Pls help Daniel Joyal