Re: [OSPF] IETF 91 OSPF WG Minutes
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 16 January 2015 19:10 UTC
Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD0C1B29ED for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:10:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b6X3CKtTJXkQ for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:10:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 781621ACEA4 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:10:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1073; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1421435455; x=1422645055; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=2ZlS1Iu3MK7qNxlv/7V9uizbrMrAbtCvQW+plKw3mjU=; b=KETjEMIp+w6P41yugtk8zMUkMo615iudoJyppZnfn3WtjIAMqxVqnm4w GaLMjMo/sxvCeyZyycsMdh+Zt40HjHspWZyHr95VQhJsnZGixYcKfjaq8 dMcZLZq/U3VINYUjaKeqz3idhkPXCAo7REzep3FpraX22PsDSgmV2zK0/ E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiEFAOVguVStJA2K/2dsb2JhbABagwZSWATGHQqFcQKBE0MBAQEBAX2EDAEBAQQBAQE3NBcEAgEIEQQBAR8QJwsdCAIEARIJiCMN0iABAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXkAAGhCMFjkyJD5IKIoNub4FFfgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,412,1418083200"; d="scan'208";a="384526026"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Jan 2015 19:10:54 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com [173.36.12.81]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0GJArKG016119 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:10:53 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.144]) by xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com ([173.36.12.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 13:10:53 -0600
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] IETF 91 OSPF WG Minutes
Thread-Index: AQHQMbW9mT3tnByONUm88oG0Srkmh5zDLaGA
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:10:52 +0000
Message-ID: <D0DECC44.BD4E%acee@cisco.com>
References: <D0902117.9279%acee@cisco.com> <04ba01d031b5$960fbdc0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <04ba01d031b5$960fbdc0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.197]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <62E63211C754A649B8EBA6FED6658F3D@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/oBa4UvQr69Jq3cqs9wfyAvijODQ>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] IETF 91 OSPF WG Minutes
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:10:59 -0000
Will try and do that in the future. Thanks, Acee On 1/16/15, 12:27 PM, "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com> wrote: >Very belatedly, it is a shame that the minutes, which are after all in >HTML, do not contain URIs for all those slides, the contents of which >are omitted from the minutes. Yes, more work for the one producing the >minutes, less work the one, perhaps more than one!, consuming the >minutes. > >Tom Petch > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> >To: "OSPF WG List" <ospf@ietf.org> >Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 3:02 AM >Subject: [OSPF] IETF 91 OSPF WG Minutes > > >> We had a very good session in Hawaii. Here is a link to the meeting >> minutes: >> >> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/minutes/minutes-91-ospf >> >> As you can see, we have a lot of drafts to discuss prior to the next >> meeting in Dallas. >> >> Thanks, >> Acee >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OSPF mailing list >> OSPF@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >> >
- [OSPF] IETF 91 OSPF WG Minutes Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] IETF 91 OSPF WG Minutes t.petch
- Re: [OSPF] IETF 91 OSPF WG Minutes Acee Lindem (acee)