Re: [OSPF] TTZ, my 2c

William McCall <william.mccall@gmail.com> Tue, 09 July 2013 20:29 UTC

Message-ID: <51DC72A4.5080106@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:29:24 -0500
From: William McCall <william.mccall@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
References: <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE4719D4CE@eusaamb101.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE4719D4CE@eusaamb101.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] TTZ, my 2c
Precedence: list

On 07/09/2013 01:50 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:
> The example assumes NO outside connectivity to
> the internal TTZ routers which begs the question of why these were ever
> connected in the first place. This would imply the 154 internal TTZ
> routers exist solely to interconnect the 6 TTZ border routers. I don't
> think anyone believes this.
This is why it kind of felt like a substitute of a l2vpn/transport 
network sitting in between the edge nodes to me. So since I didn't ask 
it explicitly earlier, why not just get rid of the 154 internal TTZ 
nodes and just replace them with a transport network?

--wm

Re: [OSPF] TTZ, my 2c Jeff Tantsura
Re: [OSPF] TTZ, my 2c A. Przygienda
Re: [OSPF] TTZ, my 2c Huaimo Chen
[OSPF] TTZ, my 2c A. Przygienda
Re: [OSPF] TTZ, my 2c Acee Lindem
Re: [OSPF] TTZ, my 2c Alvaro Retana (aretana)
Re: [OSPF] TTZ, my 2c Acee Lindem
Re: [OSPF] TTZ, my 2c William McCall
Re: [OSPF] TTZ, my 2c Huaimo Chen
Re: [OSPF] TTZ, my 2c Huaimo Chen
Re: [OSPF] TTZ, my 2c Huaimo Chen