Re: [OSPF] TTZ, my 2c

William McCall <william.mccall@gmail.com> Tue, 09 July 2013 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <william.mccall@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C9211E815F for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.479
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.479 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.120, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kMgifthPlXMf for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22c.google.com (mail-ob0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5607211E8156 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id wo10so7390191obc.17 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=80F1nEyWodFt8ra5JdywGtvjiL2X7zOZXpPiFxKGqNk=; b=CUMuPltouVJmhxbiSaa+EtCd9RqRhv2ambm11IXbJNdRmYmuQDy6rJbgjbxIbRkKYS Kp5R2ZWp+hBPG6ZW3ic6MEI3OeM5okwYwQh3COi97STLWktlCYKx6Rv5CBuQt6PFT8Qu /l1/Cu2MnC8bkx5pdxBTGKqx1TES1fmkZuYIWAeXy58SRBPhO/8NMlisYqQb6rNWsbYP dbdf0nVu0TVkY1Kky5yjcQSusTdl8nDMTHNMo02u68NOdSxOMsa8kk4tzpeejDYFzqMk H1lz9LVLkdiTt+1e0frK4r5PTJSQnOpt7RtIp2n3qcy+cUa9wqnV8K+jpoCHXqikGL5q WLvQ==
X-Received: by 10.182.110.164 with SMTP id ib4mr17029783obb.87.1373401763712; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.10.0.56] (cpe-66-25-3-111.tx.res.rr.com. [66.25.3.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kz3sm39903538obb.6.2013.07.09.13.29.22 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51DC72A4.5080106@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:29:24 -0500
From: William McCall <william.mccall@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
References: <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE4719D4CE@eusaamb101.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE4719D4CE@eusaamb101.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] TTZ, my 2c
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 20:29:25 -0000

On 07/09/2013 01:50 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:
> The example assumes NO outside connectivity to
> the internal TTZ routers which begs the question of why these were ever
> connected in the first place. This would imply the 154 internal TTZ
> routers exist solely to interconnect the 6 TTZ border routers. I don't
> think anyone believes this.
This is why it kind of felt like a substitute of a l2vpn/transport 
network sitting in between the edge nodes to me. So since I didn't ask 
it explicitly earlier, why not just get rid of the 154 internal TTZ 
nodes and just replace them with a transport network?

--wm